The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their worksFairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy
The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works
Fairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy, Ancient
_Gorg._ 493 A. I once heard one of the wise men say that now we are
dead and the body is our tomb, and that that part of the soul where
desires are, it so happens, is open to persuasion, and moves upward or
downward. And, indeed, a clever man—perhaps some inhabitant of Sicily
or Italy—speaking allegorically, and taking the word from ‘credible’
(πίθανος) and ‘persuadable’ (πιστικός), called this a jar (πίθος);
and he called those without intelligence uninitiated, and that part
of the soul of uninitiated persons where the desires are, he called
its intemperateness, and said it was not watertight, as a jar might be
pierced with holes—using the simile because of its insatiate desires.
_Gorg._ 507 E. And the wise men say that one community embraces heaven
and earth and gods and men and friendship and order and temperance and
righteousness, and for that reason they call this whole a universe, my
friend, for it is not without order nor yet is there excess. It seems to
me that you do not pay attention to these things, though you are wise in
regard to them. But it has escaped your notice that geometrical equality
prevails widely among both gods and men.
PASSAGES IN ARISTOTLE REFERRING TO THE PYTHAGOREANS.
_Phys._ iii. 4; 203 a 1. For all who think they have worthily applied
themselves to such philosophy, have discoursed concerning the infinite,
and they all have asserted some first principle of things—some, like
the Pythagoreans and Plato, a first principle existing by itself, not
connected with anything else, but being itself the infinite in its
essence. Only the Pythagoreans found it among things perceived by sense
(for they say that number is not an abstraction), and they held that it
was the infinite outside the heavens.
iii. 4; 204 a 33. (The Pythagoreans) both hold that the infinite is
being, and divide it.
iv. 6; 213 b 22. And the Pythagoreans say that there is a void, and that
it enters into the heaven itself from the infinite air, as though it (the
heaven) were breathing; and this void defines the natures of things,
inasmuch as it is a certain separation and definition of things that lie
together; and this is true first in the case of numbers, for the void
defines the nature of these.
_De coel._ i. 1; 268 a 10. For as the Pythagoreans say, the all and all
things are defined by threes; for end and middle and beginning constitute
the number of the all, and also the number of the triad.
ii. 2; 284 b 6. And since there are some who say that there is a right
and left of the heavens, as, for instance, those that are called
Pythagoreans (for such is their doctrine), we must investigate whether it
is as they say.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account