The Flying Saucers are RealKeyhoe, Donald E. (Donald Edward)
History
The Flying Saucers are Real
Keyhoe, Donald E. (Donald Edward)
Unidentified flying objects
There were other possibilities for both attack and defense. Ordinarily,
projects with wartime value are kept under wraps, or at least not
widely publicized. Of course, the explanation might be very simple: The
completion of the satellite vehicle was so remote that there seemed no
need for secrecy. But in that case, why had the program been announced
at all?
If the purpose had been propaganda, it looked like a weak gesture. The
Soviets would not be greatly worried by a dream weapon forty or fifty
years off. Besides that, the Pentagon, as a rule, doesn’t go for such
propaganda. There was only one conventional answer that made any sense.
If we had heard that the Soviets were about to announce such a program,
as a propaganda trick, it would be smart to beat them to it. But I had
no proof of, any such Russian intention.
The date on Secretary Forrestal’s co-ordination announcement was
December 30, 1948. One day later, the order creating Project “Saucer”
had been signed. That didn’t prove anything; winding up the year,
Forrestal could have signed a hundred orders. I was getting too
suspicious.
At any rate, I had now analyzed the Gorman case and checked on our
space plans. Tomorrow I would see Redell and find out what he knew.
CHAPTER XII
When I called Redell’s office I found he had flown to Dallas and would
not be back for two days. By the time he returned, I had written a
draft of the Gorman case, with my answer to the balloon explanation.
When I saw him, the next morning, I asked him to look it over.
Redell lighted his pipe and then read the draft, nodding to himself now
and then.
“I think that’s correct analysis,” he said when he finished. “That was
a very curious case. You know, Project ‘Saucer’ even had psychiatrists
out there. If Gorman had been the only witness, I think they’d have
called it a hallucination. As it was, they took a crack at him and the
C.A.A. men in their preliminary report.”
Though I recalled that there had been a comment, I didn’t remember the
wording. Redell looked it up and read it aloud:
“‘From a psychological aspect, the Gorman incident raised the question,
“Is it possible for an object without appreciable shape or known
aeronautical configuration to appear to travel at variable speeds and
maneuver intelligently?”’”
“Hallucination might sound like a logical answer,” I said, “until you
check all the testimony. But there are just too many witnesses who
confirm Gorman’s report. Also, he seems like a pretty level-headed
chap.”
Redell filled his pipe again. “But you still can’t quite accept it?”
“I’m positive they saw the light—but what the devil was it? How could
it fly without some kind of airfoil?”
“Maybe it didn’t. You remember Gorman described an odd fuzziness around
the edge of the light? It’s in this Air Force report. That could have
been a reflection from the airfoil.”
“Yes, but Gorman would have seen any solid—” I stopped, as Redell made
a negative gesture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account