first described in the “Edinburgh Review” for 1845 by a vigorous writer
and masterly geologist, (generally understood to be Professor Sedgwick of
Cambridge,) as “a characteristic portion of a fish undoubtedly belonging
to the Cestraciont family of the Placoid order.” In the “American
Journal of Science” for 1846, Professor Silliman figured, from a work
of the States’ Surveyors, the defensive spine of a Placoid found in the
Onondago Limestone of New York,—a rock which occurs near the base of the
Upper Silurian System, as developed in the western world;[23] and in
the same passage he made reference to a mutilated spine detected in a
still lower American deposit,—the Oriskany Sandstone. In the Geological
Journal for 1847, it was announced by Professor Sedgwick, that he had
found “_defences of fishes_” in the Upper Llandeilo Flags, and by Sir
Roderick Murchison, that the “defence of an _Onchus_” had been detected
by the geologists of the Government survey, in the Limestone near Bala.
Sir Roderick referred in the same number to the remains of a fish found
by Professor Phillips in the Wenlock Shale. And such, up to the present
time, is the actual _amount_ of the evidence with which we have to deal,
and the dates of its piecemeal production. Let us next consider the
_order of its occurrence in the geologic scale_.
{ +-----+
{ Upper | | Fish, 1838,
{ Ludlow. | 1 | (Murchison.)
{ | | Fish, 1842,
{ +-----+ (Phillips.)
{ Aymestry | |
{ Limestone. | 2 |
{ +-----+
UPPER SILURIAN ROCKS. { Lower | |
{ Ludlow. | 3 |
{ +-----+
{ Wenlock | | Fish, 1845,
{ Limestone. | 4 | (Sedgwick.)
{ | | Fish, 1846,
{ +-----+ (Silliman.)
{ Wenlock | 5 | Fish, 1847.
{ Shale. | | (Phillips.)
+-----+
-----
{ +-----+
{ Caradoc | |
{ Sandstone, | 6 |
{ &c. | |
LOWER SILURIAN ROCKS. { +-----+
{ Llandeilo | | Fish, 1847,
{ Flags, &c. | 7 | (Sedgwick.)
{ +-----+
-----
{ +-----+
{ Plynlimmon | |
{ Group. | _a_ |
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account