The Forgotten Man, and Other EssaysSumner, William Graham
Science
The Forgotten Man, and Other Essays
Sumner, William Graham
Economics; Social sciences
This party, for it soon became a party, found an alliance in a quarter
where it would hardly have been expected, in the slave-owning planters
of the South--an alliance which has been of immense importance in our
political history. The planters, at the outbreak of the war, had been
heavily indebted to English capitalists and merchants. They now feared
that they would be compelled to pay their debts, and they saw in the
treaty-making power of the general government the source from which
this compulsion would come. They therefore opposed any union which
would strengthen and give vigor to that power. To this party were added
those who had adopted, on theoretical and philosophical grounds, the
enthusiasm for liberty which was then prevalent in both hemispheres.
It should be added to the characteristics of this party that it looked
with indifference upon foreign commerce, cared little for foreign
opinion, would have been glad to be isolated from the Old World, and
had very crude opinions as to the status and relations of European
nations.
This party naturally went on to confound liberty with equality, and
political virtue with tenacity of rights. It furthermore confounded
power with privilege, and thought that it must allow no civil power
or authority to exist if it meant really to exterminate aristocratic
privilege. It was not so clear in its conception of political duties,
and certainly failed to see that the best citizen is not the one who
is most tenacious of his political rights, but the one who is most
faithful to his political duties; that envy and jealousy are not
political virtues; and that equality can be attained only by cutting
off every social advance and setting up as the standard, not what is
highest, but what is a low average.
An opposing party gradually formed itself of men of wider information
and superior training. These men understood the institutions of Great
Britain and their contrast to those of any other country in Europe.
They understood just what the war had done for the Colonies. They did
not consider that it had altered the internal institutions inherited
from the mother country, or set the Colonies adrift upon a sea of
political speculation to try to find a political utopia. Some of them
joined for a time in the prevalent opinion that the Americans were
better and purer than the rest of mankind, but experience soon taught
them their error. Tradition and experience still had weight with
them; and in making innovations they sought development rather than
destruction and reconstruction. They were conservative by property,
education, and character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account