The respectable vagabonds of society are a large family, much larger
than is usually supposed. They are often well born, almost always well
mannered, invariably well dressed. They do not, at first blush, appear
to discharge any very great or necessary function in life; but we must
by no means, from that, infer their inutility. Naturalists tell us
that several varieties of insect existence we rashly set down as mere
annoyances, have their peculiar spheres of usefulness and good; and,
doubtless, these same loungers contribute in some mysterious manner to
the welfare of that state which they only seem to burden. We are told
that but for flies, for instance, we should be infested with myriads of
winged tormentors, insinuating themselves into our meat and drink, and
rendering life miserable. Is there not something very similar performed
by the respectable class I allude to? Are they not invariably devouring
and destroying some vermin a little smaller than themselves, and making
thus a healthier atmosphere for their betters? If good society only knew
the debt it owes to these defenders of its privileges, a “Vagabonds'
Home and Aged Asylum” would speedily figure amongst bur national
charities.
We have been led to these thoughts by observing how distinctly different
was Major Scaresby's tone in talking of the Countess when he addressed
his betters or spoke in his own class. To the former he gave vent to all
his sarcasm and bitterness; they liked it just because they would n't
condescend to it themselves. To his own he put on the bullying air of
one who said, “How should _you_ possibly know what vices such great
people have, any more than you know what they have for dinner? _I_ live
amongst them,--_I_ understand them,--_I_ am aware that what would be
very shocking in _you_ is quite permissible to _them_. _They_ know
how to be wicked; _you_ only know how to be gross.” And thus Scaresby
talked, and sneered, and scoffed, making such a hash of good and evil,
such a Maelstrom of right and wrong, that it were a subtle moralist who
could have extracted one solitary scrap of uncontaminated meaning from
all his muddy lucubrations.
He, however, effected this much: he kept the memory of her who had
gone, alive by daily calumnies. He embalmed her in poisons, each morning
appearing with some new trait of her extravagance, till the world, grown
sick of himself and his theme, vowed they would hear no more of either;
and so she was forgotten.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account