He could not, do all that he would, disabuse himself of a very
low estimate of men and their motives. He did not slide into this
philosophy, as certain indolent people do, just to save them the trouble
of discriminating; he did not acquire it by the hard teachings of
adversity. No; it came upon him slowly and gradually, the fruit, as he
believed, of calm judgment and much reflection upon life. As little did
he accept it willingly; he even labored against the conviction: but,
strive as he might, there it was, and there it would remain.
His fixed impression was, that in every circumstance and event in
life there was always a _dessous des cartes_,--a deeper game concealed
beneath the surface,--and that it was a mere question of skill and
address how much of this penetrated through men's actions. If this
theory unravelled many a tangled web of knavery to him, it also served
to embarrass and confuse him in situations where inferior minds had
never recognized a difficulty! How much ingenuity did he expend to
detect what had no existence! How wearily did he try for soundings where
there was no bottom!
Through the means of the Princess he had learned--what some very wise
heads do not yet like to acknowledge--that the feeling of the despotic
governments towards England was very different from what it had been at
the close of the great war with Napoleon. They had grown more dominant
and exacting, just as we were becoming every hour more democratic. To
maintain our old relations with them, therefore, on the old footing,
would be only to involve ourselves in continual difficulty, with a
certainty of final failure; and the only policy that remained was to
encourage the growth of liberal opinions on the Continent, out of which
new alliances might be formed, to recompense us for the loss of the
old ones. There is a story told of a certain benevolent prince, whose
resources were, unhappily, not commensurate with his good intentions,
and whose ragged retinue wearied him with entreaties for assistance. “Be
of good cheer,” said he, one day, “I have ordered a field of flax to be
sown, and you shall all of you have new shirts.” Such were pretty much
the position and policy of England. Out of our crop of Constitutionalism
we speculated on a rich harvest, to be afterwards manufactured for our
use and benefit. We leave it to deeper heads to say if the result has
been all that we calculated on, and, asking pardon for such digression,
we join Sir Horace once more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account