He who has so often been reproached with aloofness looked at many
common facts, and saw what we see there—and beyond. His first lesson
of religion is that things seen are temporal, unseen things eternal;
yet is the temporal much for the eternally-minded, who preserves the
all-important sense of wonder. “Now that man was ready, the horse was
brought,” he writes; and continues:
“The timeliness of this invention of the locomotive must be
conceded. To us Americans it seems to have fallen as a
political aid. We could not have held the vast North America
together which now we engage to do. It was strange, too,
that when it was time to build a road across to the Pacific,
a railroad, a ship-road, a telegraph, and in short, a
perfect communication in every manner for all
nations,—’twas strange to see how it was secured. _The
good World-Soul understands us well._”
Nowise was Emerson a Ruskinian. To the railroad he says—“like the
courageous Lord Mayor at his first hunting, when told the hare was
coming: ‘Let it come in Heaven’s name, I am not afraid on’t.’” And
this assurance is all the more welcome as one of the not too frequent
flashes of his humor.
IV
While an author is often the worst-qualified critic of individual
books or passages in his own work, he has almost always expressed
somewhere the final criticism of his total. So it is with Emerson. On
one page he defines for us the type of idealism of which he was an
exponent:
“We are idealists whenever we prefer an idea to a
sensation…. Character is more to us…. Religion makes us
idealists.”
On another page, he writes:
“Malthus existed to say, Population outruns food: Owen
existed to say, ‘Given the circumstance, the man’s given. I
can educate a tiger’: Swedenborg, that inner and outer
correspond: Fourier, that the destinies are proportioned to
the attractions; Bentham, the greatest good of the greatest
number. _But what do you exist to say?_”
It is no tragedy if this sower of good seed said no one thing, and
only repeated many unequally wise counsels, and, by the wireless
telegraph of sympathetic genius, spelled out the dots and dashes that,
for the rest of us, unschooled in science, might have remained dots
and dashes till the day of judgment. Emerson’s contemporaries greatly
needed the man and his serene preaching—so undisturbed—while
Theist, atheist, pantheist
Define and wrangle how they list.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account