[786] Fallmerayer, _Originalberichte_, ii. 15, 319; Stella, cited by Muralt, ii. 533; Ibn Batutah, ii. 343. [787] Matteo Villani, in Muratori, xiv. 663. [788] Shehabeddin, 359; Ibn Batutah, ii. 277. [789] Shehabeddin, 371; Ibn Batutah, 258-9, 265; Bustron, _Chronique de Chypre_, 296; Mas-Latrie, _Trésor_, col. 1802; Matteo Villani, in Muratori, xiv, col. 662; Urban V, _Epp. secr._, i. 161; Rasmussen, 45; Schiltberger, 19. (I cannot agree with Bruun that Adana is meant, for there is no reason to believe that the Osmanlis crossed the Taurus into Cilicia for more than one hundred years after the events Schiltberger was describing. See above, p. 296, _n._ 3.) [790] See note for Mikhalitch. [791] Weil, iv. 504-624; Heyd, passim under Tarsus, Lajazzo, Adana, and Alexandretta; Mas-Latrie, _Bibl. de l’École des Chartes_, vi. 310-11; Le Nain de Tillemont (éd. Gaulle), iii. 9; iv. 459; Abulfaradj, _Chron. Syr._, 572; Bertrandon de la Broquière (éd. Schéfer), introd., lv. 90-1. [792] Finlay, iv. 386-92; Panaretos, _passim_. [793] Ibn Batutah, ii. 314; Cant. ii. 13, pp. 388-90; Phr. i. 8, p. 37; Greg. xi. 9, p. 554; Sauli, i. 256-7. See also in text of this book under Orkhan. [794] Matteo Villani, in Muratori, xiv. 650, under spring of 1360, says: ‘E per tante guerre e divisioni de’ Turchi gli paesi loro erano rotti e in grande tribulazione. E per questa cagione i Greci havieno minore persecuzione da loro. E più ciò fu materia al Re di Cipro di fare l’impresa sopra loro con honore e vittoria grande.’ Mas-Latrie, in _Bibl. de l’École des Chartes_, 2e série, ii. 122-3, says that the Karamanian army was defeated before Gorhigos in 1361, and that Cyprus, then at the height of its power, was able to impose tribute on the emirs of Asia Minor. [795] Ibn Batutah, ii. 288-95. [796] See above under Smyrna, Aïdin, Menteshe, Fukeh, and Tawas. Also in text of book, p. 44. [797] Cf. Weil, iv. _passim._ [798] See above, p. 123. [799] The ordinals following the names of Byzantine emperors are a cause of confusion, as there is no universal agreement as to the method of numbering. Some historians count by sovereigns _of the same family_ bearing a particular name (i. e. John I Palaeologos and John II Palaeologos), while others number by the imperial line as a whole (i. e. John V Palaeologos, John VI Cantacuzenos, John VII Palaeologos). I have used the second system. End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Foundation of the Ottoman Empire; a history of the Osmanlis up to the d, by Herbert Adams Gibbons