2º The couple which acts on the magnetic needle is no longer a simple
director couple, for its moment with respect to the axis of the needle
is not null. It breaks up into a director couple, properly so called,
and a supplementary couple which tends to produce the continuous
rotation of which we have above spoken;
3º Finally the force acting on an element of current is not normal to
this element.
In other words, _the unity of the magnetic force has disappeared_.
Let us see in what this unity consists. Two systems which exercise the
same action on a magnetic pole will exert also the same action on an
indefinitely small magnetic needle, or on an element of current placed
at the same point of space as this pole.
Well, this is true if these two systems contain only closed currents;
this would no longer be true if these two systems contained open
currents.
It suffices to remark, for instance, that, if a magnetic pole is placed
at _A_ and an element at _B_, the direction of the element being along
the prolongation of the sect _AB_, this element which will exercise no
action on this pole will, on the other hand, exercise an action either
on a magnetic needle placed at the point _A_, or on an element of
current placed at the point _A_.
5. _Induction._--We know that the discovery of electrodynamic induction
soon followed the immortal work of Ampère.
As long as it is only a question of closed currents there is no
difficulty, and Helmholtz has even remarked that the principle of the
conservation of energy is sufficient for deducing the laws of induction
from the electrodynamic laws of Ampère. But always on one condition, as
Bertrand has well shown; that we make besides a certain number of
hypotheses.
The same principle again permits this deduction in the case of open
currents, although of course we can not submit the result to the test of
experiment, since we can not produce such currents.
If we try to apply this mode of analysis to Ampère's theory of open
currents, we reach results calculated to surprise us.
In the first place, induction can not be deduced from the variation of
the magnetic field by the formula well known to savants and practicians,
and, in fact, as we have said, properly speaking there is no longer a
magnetic field.
But, further, if a circuit _C_ is subjected to the induction of a
variable voltaic system _S_, if this system _S_ be displaced and
deformed in any way whatever, so that the intensity of the currents of
this system varies according to any law whatever, but that after these
variations the system finally returns to its initial situation, it seems
natural to suppose that the _mean_ electromotive force induced in the
circuit _C_ is null.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account