New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
The political history of Massachusetts under the charter was thus made
up of two separate elements. The first was the resistance of the
governing group to any effort of England, legal or illegal, to assert
her rights, even justly, over her colony; and the second was the
struggle of a part of the colonists themselves, for toleration and
liberty, against the governing class. Even had the colony never
separated from England, we should, in all probability, have come to
possess the same measure of civil liberty and religious toleration that
the English have to-day; but that separation having taken place, had the
Puritan oligarchy retained and extended their power, we should have but
little of either. It is, therefore, the second conflict which, although
less dramatic, is the more vital in the history of human freedom. We
must now turn to consider the earliest important attacks from both of
the quarters indicated.
Of those from across the water, the first was launched, as could well
have been foreseen, by Sir Ferdinando Gorges, and was brought upon the
colony directly through the policy pursued by its leaders. The untiring
interest of Gorges in the affairs of New England, and his hope of yet
creating a profitable settlement there for himself, were both well known
to the Puritans. The old knight had spent vastly greater sums in the
effort to plant the wilderness than had been contributed by any
individual among themselves. He had attempted the colonization of Maine
at a time when the men who were now engaged in banishing his agents were
hardly more than children.[370] He had made no effort to disturb the
Pilgrims during their ten-years' stay at Plymouth, and would probably
have left the Massachusetts settlers also in peace, had it not been for
their denial of the rights he claimed in a part of the soil they had
preëmpted, and for their treatment of his emissaries. The Massachusetts
authorities, by throwing down the gauntlet, had created a powerful enemy
who was not slow in picking it up.
Footnote 370:
Winthrop was a lad of 19 in 1607, and Endicott but 16.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account