New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Of somewhat more practical service, in view of the fact that church
membership was an indispensable qualification for the franchise, was the
law, passed at the same court, that no new churches could be organized
without the approbation of the magistrates and a majority of the elders
of the preëxisting churches, and that no man could become a freeman who
was not a member of a church so approved of. By this means a degree of
control, at least, could be maintained over the great numbers of
newcomers now arriving.
We do not wish to convey the impression that the leaders of the colony
were animated by mere love of power or a vulgar ambition, strong though
the former was in most of them. But the danger to the liberties of their
subjects was no less great because Winthrop and Cotton were wholly
convinced of the divine nature of their mission. It is too frequently
assumed that despotic acts are necessarily those of a self-conscious
despot; whereas, in most cases, they are merely the readiest means
employed for reaching ends which authority may think itself rightly
privileged, or morally bound, to attain. Charles and Laud were no less
certain than the rulers of Church and State in Massachusetts, that their
mandate was a heavenly one. Liberty cannot mean one thing in old England
and another in New, nor can intolerance be condoned in the one and
condemned in the other. The King and the Archbishop were no more closely
allied, nor more bent upon forcing their own will upon that of the
people, than were the civil and ecclesiastical powers of the little
American commonwealth, however worthy or unworthy the motives of each
may have been. Pride in the valiant work that the Massachusetts leaders
did in subduing the wilderness, and in the sacrifices that they made for
their religious beliefs, has tended to make their descendants, in the
words of the old English saw, “to their faults a little blind, and to
their virtues very kind”; but if the nations of the world are to grow in
mutual understanding and brotherly feeling, their histories must be
written from the standpoint of justice to all, and not from that of a
mistaken national piety.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account