New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
This almost complete absence of any steady policy or consistent control
over the component parts of the imperial structure not only was
unacceptable to the merchants at home, but would probably have been
destructive of the Empire had it continued without change. Certain
measures of far-reaching importance, however, had already been enacted
under Cromwell; and the Restoration, which strengthened the government
and united the people, enabled England to undertake a more comprehensive
scheme for imperial organization, although in New England, owing to the
incorrigible tendencies of the Stuarts, it blundered into criminal
folly.
At first, two councils were created, one for Trade, and the other for
Plantations, their instructions largely following drafts prepared by the
London merchants Povey and Noell, who had for some years been actively
engaged in the study of colonial questions, and the formulation of a
colonial policy.[746] However these instructions might strike colonists
who refused to acknowledge any right of control whatever by the
mother-country, they could not but appear wise and just to the statesmen
and citizens at home. The councillors were ordered, in the first place,
to make a complete survey—by means of correspondence with the colonial
governors—of the laws and institutions, population and means of defense
of each colony. They were to study “means for the rendering those
dominions usefull to England, and England helpful to them, and for the
bringing the several Colonies and Plantations, within themselves, into a
more certain civill and uniforme waie of government and for the better
ordering and distributing of publique justice among them.” They were,
further, to maintain a correspondence with the local authorities in the
several colonies, so that they might have constant knowledge of “their
complaints, their wants, their abundance,” and their shipping, the
latter for revision of the Navigation Laws. Finally, they were to study
the methods employed by other states in their colonial government, and
to call experts to their assistance in any particular when needed.[747]
The Council was made up of able men, almost all of them authorities on
colonial questions, and in close touch with the colonies, while the
business, in the first instance, was frequently entrusted to
experts.[748] Of the work of the Council, Professor Andrews writes, that
“there was not an important phase of colonial life and government, not a
colonial claim or dispute, that was not considered carefully,
thoroughly, and in the main, impartially.”[749] In fact, an unbiased
study of the actions taken by the Privy Council and its committees
during nearly the whole of the seventeenth century leads one to agree
with the editor of the Acts, that, as a governing body, it was “anxious
to help, willing to take advice, free from preconception.”[750]
Footnote 746:
Andrews, _British Committees_, pp. 38, 56, 67 _ff._
Footnote 747:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account