Home rule -- Ireland; Ireland -- Politics and government
[113] Lord Welby (Final Report, p. 54) compared his proposal for Ireland
with the system in the Isle of Man, where the proceeds of a tariff
distinct from that of Great Britain were devoted in the first instance
to the payment of a fixed Imperial contribution and the surplus to local
needs. But in the Isle of Man the whole point was that the tariff was a
local tariff, chosen by Manxmen to suit themselves, while the
administration was under Manx control.
[114] Letter to the _Belfast Telegraph_, October 7, 1911.
CHAPTER XII
THE PRESENT FINANCIAL SITUATION
I.
ANGLO-IRISH FINANCE TO-DAY.
The finances of Ireland since the Union, when reviewed by the Royal
Commission in 1894-1896, exhibited five principal features:
1. A declining population.
2. An estimated true taxable capacity falling as compared with that of
Great Britain, and standing in 1893-94 at a maximum of 1 to 19.
3. A revenue stationary for thirty-four years, and showing in 1893-94 a
ratio of 1 to 12 with that of Great Britain.
4. A growing local expenditure (though stationary for the last four
years).
5. A dwindling net contribution to Imperial services (though stationary
for the last four years).
If we review the subsequent seventeen years, we find:
1. A population still declining, though at a slower rate.
2. An estimated true taxable capacity still falling as compared with
that of Great Britain, and now standing at a maximum of 1 to 24.[115]
That is, Ireland ought strictly to be paying no more than
one-twenty-fifth of the United Kingdom revenue.
3. A revenue rising, but very slowly and inelastically as compared with
that of Great Britain, and now showing a ratio of 1 to 15; so that the
"over-taxation" of Ireland, as reckoned on the Royal Commission's
principles, is still at least three millions.[116]
4. A local expenditure growing rapidly and disproportionately to Irish
revenue; now just double the expenditure of 1893-94.
5. A net contribution to Imperial services automatically diminishing
with the growth of Irish expenditure, disappearing altogether in
1909-10, and now converted into an adverse balance against Ireland of
L1,312,500.
In Great Britain during the same seventeen years, population, taxable
capacity, revenue, expenditure, and net contribution to Imperial
services have all grown steadily, and, what is more important, in
healthy proportions to one another.
On the next page will be found the comparative figures for Ireland and
Great Britain of revenue, expenditure, and contribution for 1893-94 and
1910-11.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account