Home rule -- Ireland; Ireland -- Politics and government
If all the elements of the problem be considered together, it will be
seen that the fiscal partnership is as ill-matched as ever, and has
produced results increasingly anomalous. Each of the partners and their
united interests suffer. Ireland is still more heavily taxed relatively
to Great Britain, yet Ireland's contribution to Imperial services has
been converted into a minus quantity. Why? Because Irish expenditure,
paid out of the common purse, has doubled, while Irish revenue has
increased by less than a third.
Let me give the final survey of Anglo-Irish finance since the Union, in
the tabular form shown by Professor Oldham at the meeting of the British
Association in September, 1911:
NET BALANCES PAID BY IRELAND TO GREAT BRITAIN.
Single Irish "True" Expenditure Balance Decadal
Year. Revenue. in Ireland. One Year. Balance.
L L L L
1819-20 5,256,564 1,564,880 3,691,684 36,916,840
1829-30 5,502,125 1,345,549 4,156,576 41,565,760
1839-40 5,415,889 1,789,567 3,626,322 36,263,220
1849-50 4,861,465 2,247,687 2,613,778 26,137,780
1859-60 7,700,334 2,304,334 5,396,000 53,960,000
1869-70 7,426,332 2,938,122 4,488,210 44,882,100
1879-80 7,280,856 4,054,549 3,226,307 32,263,070
1889-90 7,734,678 5,057,708 2,676,970 26,769,700
1899-1900 8,664,500 6,980,000 1,684,500 16,845,000
Averaged Balances for 90 years 315,603,470
Add, Actual Balances, 1900-09 16,214,000
Net Payments, in 99 years 331,817,470
Deduct Drawings, deficit of 1909-10 2,357,500
Net Payments, in 100 years 329,459,970
Add, Actual Balance, 1910-11 321,000
Net Balances paid by Ireland to Great Britain, 1809-1911 329,780,970
What has become of Sir David Barbour's argument in favour of the
existing fiscal system? He admitted that Ireland was overtaxed by two
millions and three-quarters. But he showed, it will be remembered, that
if not only the revenue, but the expenditure and contribution to
Imperial services had all been in proportion to Ireland's real taxable
capacity of one-twentieth, she would have been a loser by a
million.[117] Ireland, therefore, he argued, had certainly no grievance,
while Great Britain received the substantial, though not strictly
sufficient, sum of two millions as Ireland's contribution to Imperial
expenses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account