Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
But cannot the believing Christian submit to scientific investigation the
doctrine of faith itself, which he must without doubt hold to be true?
This must surely be allowed if he is to convince himself scientifically of
the truth of it. Indeed, this is allowed. He may critically examine
everything to the very bottom, even the existence of God, the rationality
of his own mind. But how can he, if no doubt is permissible? To examine
means to search doubtingly; it means to call the matter in question—this,
too, is right. It is, on the one hand, a doctrine of the Catholic Church
that they who have received faith through the ministry of the Church, that
is, they that have been made familiar with the essential subjects of the
faith and the motives of their credibility by proper religious
instruction, must not doubt their faith. They have no reasonable excuse
for doubting because they are assured of the truth of the faith. We have
discussed this point before.(4)
As a matter of course only voluntary doubts are excluded, doubts
by which one assents deliberately and wilfully to the judgment
that perhaps not all may be true that is proposed for our belief.
Involuntary doubts are neither excluded nor sinful. These are
apparent counter-arguments, objections, difficulties against the
faith, which occur to the mind without getting its conscious
approval. They are not unlikely, because the cognition of the
credibility of Christian truths, while it is certain, is yet
lacking in that obvious clearness which would render obscurity and
counter-argument impossible; the assent to faith is free. Doubts
of this kind are apt to molest the mind and buzz round it like
bothersome insects, but they are not sinful because they do not
set aside the assent to faith any more than the cloud that
intervenes between us and the sun can extinguish its light. The
assent to faith is withdrawn only when the will with clear
consideration approves of the judgment that the doubt may be
right.
But what about doubts which one cannot solve? Would we not owe it
to truth and probity to withhold assent to faith for a while?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account