Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
Nor did the Papal charter deeds exclude any profane science. The common
formula, which always prevails, authorizes to teach indiscriminately _in
jure canonico et civili necnon in medicina et qualibet alia licita
facultate_. Only one science was frequently excepted, and that was just
theology. Of the forty-six high schools that had been established up to
the year 1400, about twenty-eight, therefore nearly two-thirds, excluded
by their charter the teaching of theology. At first a number of
universities sprang up merely as law schools, others as medical schools,
and there was then no need to include the science of theology in the
schedule of studies. Furthermore, Paris was ever since the twelfth century
looked upon as the home and the natural place for theology (_Denifle_, 703
f.). Hence the benevolence of the Church towards the universities was not
merely determined by selfish interest.
Or was it, nevertheless? May the Church not have bestowed so much care on
the homes of science in order to increase her own influence thereby, and
also with an eye to the future? This assertion has been made. But this
assertion is an injustice and it is against the testimony of history. The
Popes very often issued their charter deeds only then, when request was
made by worldly rulers and by the cities themselves. Hence there was no
hurried self-assertion. And the Church has never denied the right to
worldly powers to found their own high schools. The theologians of the
thirteenth century expressedly declared it to be the duty of princes to
provide for institutions of learning (Cfr. _Thomas of Aquin_, De regimine
principum, I, 13; Op. contra impug. relig. 3).
Thus up to the year 1400 nine high schools had received no
charters at all, ten only imperial charters or charters from their
local sovereigns. If the Popes had cared only about their
influence, why then did they treat such colleges with the same
benevolence? Spain’s first college was founded at Paleneia in the
years 1212-1214 by _Alfonso VIII._ without asking the Pope. When
soon afterwards it was in trouble it was _Honorius III._ who aided
_Alfonso’s_ successor in restoring it, by assigning some
ecclesiastical income to its professors. When the college was
nearly wrecked and Rome once more applied to for help, _Urban IV._
lent an aiding hand because he did not want _ut lucerna tanta
claritatis in commune mutorum dispendium sic extincta remaneat_.
_Frederick II._ had founded a university of his own. When it
failed it was _Clement IV._ who urged _King Charles_ of Anjou to
re-establish it. _In eodem regno facias et jubeas hujusmodi
studium reformari_ (_Denifle_, 478, 459). This is not the language
and action of one who is only ruled by the passion to spread his
own influence, and not guided by benevolence for science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account