Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
This statement again reminds that the accusations against the
Catholic Church and her institutions are to be considered with
caution, because of the ignorance of her opponents in Catholic
things. This is especially true of the Index. Thus the above
assertion is false. _Dante’s_ “Divina Commedia” (the work referred
to) is neither forbidden nor needs approval nor correction: of the
classical literature of the world little or nothing is forbidden;
even morally offensive books, that are considered classical, may
without ecclesiastical permission be read for the sake of their
elegant diction, whenever their reading is required by one’s work
or duty of teaching.
A few examples of the _incredible ignorance_ alluded to will
suffice. In the “Grande Dictionnaire Universel du XIX. Siècle” it
is actually stated that the works of _Albert the Great_ were
condemned by a decree of April 10, 1666. What does the Index
really forbid? It states: “_Alberto __ Magno, diviso in tre libri,
nel primo si tratta della virtu delle herbe, nel secondo della
virtu delle pietre, e nel terzo della virtu di alcuni
animali._—Albert the Great, in three parts: the first treats of
the virtue of plants; the second, of the virtue of stones; and the
third, of the virtue of some animals.” It is the title of a little
superstitious book, attributed to “Albert the Great” by an unknown
author.
The first edition of the Index of _Leo XIII._ in 1900 was sold out
in less than a year; a second edition followed in 1901, and, like
the first, could be had at all booksellers, at a very moderate
price. In December, 1901, there appeared in the Anglo-American
weekly, “The Roman World,” an article which says that it is
difficult to obtain this list of notorious books forbidden to
Catholics, unless one be a Church official, since only a few
copies are printed and even these are not handled by general
book-dealers; hence that no details could be given about the
purchase of the copy referred to; but it was quite evident that it
had commanded a good price. “The copy in question, a model of fine
printing, might be worth about $40 to $50, but owing to its
rareness, it had undoubtedly cost $400. The history of this famous
Index is interesting. The one who first hit upon the idea was
_Charles V._ of Spain, about 1550. The first compilation of the
book-list was made by the university of Louvain in 1564, Pope
_Paul IV._ assuming the direction of the edition. It remained for
357 years in the hands of the Pope.” Every one of these statements
is false. And just as false is the statement that the “Syllabus
condemns not only a book written by a Pope, but by Pope _Leo
XIII._ himself.” Still it could not surprise us, since even
David’s psalter is on the Index! When the Index of _Leo XIII._ was
published, Dr.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account