Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
It is manifest that, together with the substantial soul,
immortality is also disposed of. True, here too the word is
cautiously retained; but by immortality is now understood
perpetuation in the human race, in the ideas of posterity, in
“objective spirit,” in the “imperishable value of ethical
possessions,” for which the individual has laboured. Some fine
words are said about it, as roses are used to cover a grave. Yet,
it is only the immortality of the barrel of Regulus, or the
Gordian knot in history, the immortality of which the printers’
press may partake in the effect of the books it prints. To quote
_Jodl_ again: “The fact of the objective spirit, together with the
organic connection of the generations to one another, form the
scientific reality of what appears in popular, mythological tenets
of faith as the idea of personal immortality ... and which has
been defended by the dualistic psychology with worthless, invalid
arguments.” The refutation of these arguments does not bother him.
“A refutation of these scholastic arguments is as little needed as
a refutation of the belief in the miracles and demons of former
centuries is needed by a man standing on the ground of modern
natural science.” This reminds one of _Haeckel’s_ method. The
latter nevertheless found it worth while in his “Weltraetsel” to
dispose in thirteen lines of six such arguments, and then to
assure the reader that “All these and similar arguments have
fallen to the ground.” That the matter in question is an idea that
has been the foundation of Christian civilization and ethics for
thousands of years, that has led millions to holiness; an idea,
indeed, that has been the common property of all nations at all
times—this seems to count for very little.
This technique of a superficial speculation, which, devoid of
piety, casts everything overboard, finds no trouble in disposing
of the entire _spiritual world_. “No one is capable,” says _Jodl_
again, “of imagining a purely spiritual reality.” This is disposed
of. “Since the war between the Aristotle-scholastic and the
mechanical method has been waged, spiritual powers have never
played any other part in the explanation of the world than that of
an unknown quantity in equations of a higher degree, which,
unsolvable by methods hitherto prevalent, are only awaiting the
superior master and a new technique (_sic_) in order to disappear”
(p. 77 _seq._).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account