Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
One who is of the opinion that religion and views of the world are but
sentiment and feeling, which change with one’s personality and
individuality, can, of course, no longer understand a dogmatic
Christianity and the obligation to hold fast to clearly defined dogmas as
unchangeable truth. I can hold dogmas and doctrinal decisions to be
unquestionably true only when I can _convince myself of their credibility_
by the judgment of my reason. If I cannot do that, and am still bound to
believe them, without the least doubt, then such obedience is compulsory
repression of the reason. Then it would indeed be necessary for the
Church, as _Kant_ says, “to instil into its flock a pious dread of the
least deviation from certain articles of faith based on history, and a
dread of all investigation, to such a degree that they dare not let a
doubt rise, even in thought, against the articles proposed for their
belief, because this would be tantamount to lending an ear to the evil
spirit” (Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft, 3. Stueck,
2. Abtlg.). Fixed dogmas may then at the very most, according to the great
master of modern thought, be of pedagogic value to a minor, until he be
grown to maturity. But to more advanced minds must be unconditionally
conceded the freedom to construct dogmas as they think best, viz., as
symbols and images for the subjective thought they underlie. This also, as
is well known, is an article of Modernism, which here again follows in the
steps of _Kant_.
“Ecclesiastical faith,” says _Kant_, “may be useful as a vehicle
to minors who can grasp a purely rational religion only through
symbols, until in the course of time, owing to the general
enlightenment, they can with the consent of everybody exchange the
form of degrading means of coercion for an ecclesiastical form
suitable to the dignity of a moral religion—that of free faith.”
“The membranes,” he says in another place, “in which the embryo
first shaped itself into man must be cast off, if he is to see the
light of day. The apron-strings of sacred tradition with its
appendages, viz., the statutes and observances which at one time
did good service, can gradually be dispensed with; they may even
become a harmful hindrance when one is growing to manhood.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account