France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
But, to the living and the struggling, a new, Fourteenth morning
dawns. Under all roofs of this distracted City, is the nodus of a
drama, not untragical, crowding towards solution. The bustlings
and preparings, the tremors and menaces; the tears that fell from
old eyes! This day, my sons, ye shall quit you like men. By the
memory of your fathers’ wrongs, by the hope of your children’s
rights! Tyranny impends in red wrath: help for you is none if not
in your own right hands. This day ye must do or die.
From earliest light, a sleepless Permanent Committee has heard
the old cry, now waxing almost frantic, mutinous: Arms! Arms!
Provost Flesselles, or what traitors there are among you, may
think of those Charleville Boxes. A hundred-and-fifty thousand of
us; and but the third man furnished with so much as a pike! Arms
are the one thing needful: with arms we are an unconquerable
man-defying National Guard; without arms, a rabble to be whiffed
with grapeshot.
Happily the word has arisen, for no secret can be kept,—that
there lie muskets at the _Hôtel des Invalides_. Thither will we:
King’s Procureur M. Ethys de Corny, and whatsoever of authority a
Permanent Committee can lend, shall go with us. Besenval’s Camp
is there; perhaps he will not fire on us; if he kill us we shall
but die.
Alas, poor Besenval, with his troops melting away in that manner,
has not the smallest humour to fire! At five o’clock this
morning, as he lay dreaming, oblivious in the _Ecole Militaire_,
a “figure” stood suddenly at his bedside: “with face rather
handsome; eyes inflamed, speech rapid and curt, air audacious:”
such a figure drew Priam’s curtains! The message and monition of
the figure was, that resistance would be hopeless; that if blood
flowed, wo to him who shed it. Thus spoke the figure; and
vanished. “Withal there was a kind of eloquence that struck one.”
Besenval admits that he should have arrested him, but did
not.[180] Who this figure, with inflamed eyes, with speech rapid
and curt, might be? Besenval knows but mentions not. Camille
Desmoulins? Pythagorean Marquis Valadi, inflamed with “violent
motions all night at the Palais Royal?” Fame names him, “Young M.
Meillar”;[181] Then shuts her lips about him for ever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account