France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
For his French Majesty, meanwhile, one of the worst things is
that he can get no hunting. Alas, no hunting henceforth; only a
fatal being-hunted! Scarcely, in the next June weeks, shall he
taste again the joys of the game-destroyer; in next June, and
never more. He sends for his smith-tools; gives, in the course of
the day, official or ceremonial business being ended, “a few
strokes of the file, _quelques coups de lime._[262] Innocent
brother mortal, why wert thou not an obscure substantial maker of
locks; but doomed in that other far-seen craft, to be a maker
only of world-follies, unrealities; things self destructive,
which no mortal hammering could rivet into coherence!
Poor Louis is not without insight, nor even without the elements
of will; some sharpness of temper, spurting at times from a
stagnating character. If harmless inertness could save him, it
were well; but he will slumber and painfully dream, and to _do_
aught is not given him. Royalist Antiquarians still shew the
rooms where Majesty and suite, in these extraordinary
circumstances, had their lodging. Here sat the Queen;
reading,—for she had her library brought hither, though the King
refused his; taking vehement counsel of the vehement
uncounselled; sorrowing over altered times; yet with sure hope of
better: in her young rosy Boy, has she not the living emblem of
hope! It is a murky, working sky; yet with golden gleams—of dawn,
or of deeper meteoric night? Here again this chamber, on the
other side of the main entrance, was the King’s: here his Majesty
breakfasted, and did official work; here daily after breakfast he
received the Queen; sometimes in pathetic friendliness; sometimes
in human sulkiness, for flesh is weak; and, when questioned about
business would answer: ‘Madame, your business is with the
children.’ Nay, Sire, were it not better you, your Majesty’s
self, took the children? So asks impartial History; scornful that
the _thicker_ vessel was not also the stronger; pity-struck for
the porcelain-clay of humanity rather than for the
tile-clay,—though indeed _both_ were broken!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account