France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
Thus, if People’s-friend Marat has today his writ of “_prise de
corps_, or seizure of body,” served on him, and dives out of
sight, tomorrow he is left at large; or is even encouraged, as a
sort of bandog whose baying may be useful. President Danton, in
open Hall, with reverberating voice, declares that, in a case
like Marat’s, ‘force may be resisted by force.’ Whereupon the
Chatelet serves Danton also with a writ;—which, however, as the
whole Cordeliers District responds to it, what Constable will be
prompt to execute? Twice more, on new occasions, does the
Chatelet launch its writ; and twice more in vain: the body of
Danton cannot be seized by Châtelet; he unseized, should he even
fly for a season, shall behold the Châtelet itself flung into
limbo.
Municipality and Brissot, meanwhile, are far on with their
Municipal Constitution. The Sixty _Districts_ shall become
Forty-eight _Sections;_ much shall be adjusted, and Paris have
its Constitution. A Constitution wholly Elective; as indeed all
French Government shall and must be. And yet, one fatal element
has been introduced: that of _citoyen actif_. No man who does not
pay the _marc d’argent_, or yearly tax equal to three days’
labour, shall be other than a _passive_ citizen: not the
slightest vote for him; were he _acting_, all the year round,
with sledge hammer, with forest-levelling axe! Unheard of! cry
Patriot Journals. Yes truly, my Patriot Friends, if Liberty, the
passion and prayer of all men’s souls, means Liberty to send your
fifty-thousandth part of a new Tongue-fencer into National
Debating-club, then, be the gods witness, ye are hardly
entreated. Oh, if in National _Palaver_ (as the Africans name
it), such blessedness is verily found, what tyrant would deny it
to Son of Adam! Nay, might there not be a Female Parliament too,
with “screams from the Opposition benches,” and “the honourable
Member borne out in hysterics?” To a Children’s Parliament would
I gladly consent; or even lower if ye wished it. Beloved
Brothers! Liberty, one might fear, is actually, as the ancient
wise men said, of Heaven. On this Earth, where, thinks the
enlightened public, did a brave little Dame de Staal (not
Necker’s Daughter, but a far shrewder than she) find the nearest
approach to Liberty? After mature computation, cool as
Dilworth’s, her answer is, _In the Bastille._[279] ‘Of Heaven?’
answer many, asking. Wo that they should _ask;_ for that is the
very misery! ‘Of Heaven’ means much; share in the National
Palaver it may, or may as probably _not_ mean.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account