France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
Parlements have been tamed, more than once. Set to perch “on the
peaks of rocks in accessible except by litters,” a Parlement
grows reasonable. O Maupeou, thou bold man, had we left thy work
where it was!—But apart from exile, or other violent methods, is
there not one method, whereby all things are tamed, even lions?
The method of hunger! What if the Parlement’s supplies were cut
off; namely its Lawsuits!
Minor Courts, for the trying of innumerable minor causes, might
be instituted: these we could call _Grand Bailliages_. Whereon
the Parlement, shortened of its prey, would look with yellow
despair; but the Public, fond of cheap justice, with favour and
hope. Then for Finance, for registering of Edicts, why not, from
our own Œil-de-Bœuf Dignitaries, our Princes, Dukes, Marshals,
make a thing we could call _Plenary Court_; and there, so to
speak, do our registering ourselves? St. Louis had his Plenary
Court, of Great Barons;[82] most useful to him: our Great Barons
are still here (at least the Name of them is still here); our
necessity is greater than his.
Such is the Loménie-Lamoignon device; welcome to the King’s
Council, as a light-beam in great darkness. The device seems
feasible, it is eminently needful: be it once well executed,
great deliverance is wrought. Silent, then, and steady; now or
never!—the World shall see one other Historical Scene; and so
singular a man as Loménie de Brienne still the Stage-manager
there.
Behold, accordingly, a Home-Secretary Bréteuil “beautifying
Paris,” in the peaceablest manner, in this hopeful spring weather
of 1788; the old hovels and hutches disappearing from our
Bridges: as if for the State too there were halcyon weather, and
nothing to do but beautify. Parlement seems to sit acknowledged
victor. Brienne says nothing of Finance; or even says, and
prints, that it is all well. How is this; such halcyon quiet;
though the Successive Loan did not fill? In a victorious
Parlement, Counsellor Goeslard de Monsabert even denounces that
“levying of the Second Twentieth on strict valuation;” and gets
decree that the valuation shall not be strict,—not on the
privileged classes. Nevertheless Brienne endures it, launches no
Lettre-de-Cachet against it. How is this?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account