The French Revolution: A Short HistoryJohnston, R. M. (Robert Matteson)
History
The French Revolution: A Short History
Johnston, R. M. (Robert Matteson)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
That was almost the end of the trouble in the west of France. There
was still a little {234} fighting in the Vendee, but after the capture
and execution of Charette and Stofflet in the early part of 1796, Hoche
was left master of the situation.
While the royalists were being shot down at Quiberon the Convention was
debating a new constitution for France, a constitution no longer
theoretical, no longer a political weapon with which to destroy the
monarchy, but practical, constructive, framed by the light of vivid
political experience, intended to maintain the Republic and to make of
it an acceptable, working machine. What was decided on was this. The
franchise which the Legislative had extended to the working classes
after the 10th of August, was to be withdrawn from them, and restricted
once more to the middle class. There were to be two houses; the lower
was to be known as the _Corps Legislatif_, or Council of Five Hundred;
the upper was to be chosen by the lower, was to number only two hundred
and fifty, and was to be known as the Ancients. The lower house was to
initiate legislation; the upper one was to do little more than to
exercise the suspensive veto which the Constitution of 1791 had given
to the King. Then there was to be an executive body, and that was
merely the Committee of Public Safety modified. {235} There were to
be five Directors elected for individual terms of five years, and
holding general control over foreign affairs, the army and navy, high
police and the ministries. The constitution further reaffirmed the
declaration of the rights of man and guaranteed the sales of the
national lands.
This constitution had many good points, was not ill adapted to the
needs and aspirations of France in the year 1795, and it was hailed
with delight by the public. This at first seemed a good symptom. But
the Convention soon discovered that this delight was founded not so
much on the excellence of the constitution, as on the fact that putting
it into force would enable France to get rid of the Convention, of the
men of the Revolution. This was a sobering thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account