The French Revolution: A Short HistoryJohnston, R. M. (Robert Matteson)
History
The French Revolution: A Short History
Johnston, R. M. (Robert Matteson)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
The King maintained his coolness and dignity. For four long hours the
mob pushed through the palace, jostling, apostrophising, the King and
Queen. A few national guards, a few members of the assembly, attempted
to give Louis some sort of protection. But he was practically
surrounded and helpless. What saved him was his coolness, his good
sense, and the fact that there was no intent to do him bodily harm save
among some groups too unimportant to make themselves felt. To please
the men of the faubourgs Louis consented to place a red liberty cap on
his head, and to empty a bottle of wine as a sign of fraternization.
Finally Vergniaud and Petion succeeded in having the palace evacuated;
and the assassination of Louis, which many had feared and a few hoped,
had been averted.
[1] There is no opportunity here for discussing adequately the clause
in the declaration to the effect that every citizen is entitled to
concur in making laws. That clause apparently conflicts with what I
have said above. My explanation of the discrepancy is based on this:
that the declaration is a much tinkered, composite document, made up
over a period of many months, and not logical at every point. The
clause here mentioned I explain as a direct echo of the elections to
the States-General; it was one of the first drafted; its precise
significance was soon lost sight of and its inconsistency remained
unnoticed.
{139}
CHAPTER X
THE MASSACRES
The event of the 20th of June was like lightning flashing in darkness.
Instantly people saw where they were. Moderate, loyal, reasonable men,
startled at the danger of the King, smarting at the indignity he had
suffered, fearful of mob rule and mob violence, rallied to the throne,
signed petitions protesting against the event. Louis himself, realizing
that his life was in jeopardy, made appeals both to the assembly and to
his people.
The first reply to the King's appeal, unsolicited and unappreciated, came
from La Fayette. On receiving news of the event of the 20th he left his
headquarters and reached Paris on the 28th. He appealed to the assembly
and rallied the centre, still responsive if a leader could be found. He
then began to concert measures for getting control of the city by means
of the national guards. At this point, however, his scheme failed. The
Court {140} would not support him, the King too prudent, the Queen too
impolitic. Marie Antoinette herself, it is said, in her rancorous
dislike of La Fayette, gave Petion the secret as to his contemplated use
of the national guards; and this proved fatal. Checked by the action of
the mayor and the Jacobins, unsupported by the Tuileries, La Fayette had
to abandon his efforts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account