The French Revolution: A Short HistoryJohnston, R. M. (Robert Matteson)
History
The French Revolution: A Short History
Johnston, R. M. (Robert Matteson)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
With terror now organized, the prisons filled, and the Revolutionary
Tribunal sending victims to the guillotine daily, the internal struggle
became one between two terrorist parties, of Hebert and of Robespierre,
both committed to the policy of the day, but with certain differences.
Hebert viewed the system as one affording personal safety,--the
executioner being safer than the victim,--and the best opportunity for
graft. The man of means was singled out by his satellites for suspicion
and arrest, and was then informed that a judicious payment in the right
quarter would secure release. Beyond that, Hebert probably cared little
enough one way or the other; he was merely concerned in extracting all
the material satisfaction he could out of life. With Robespierre the
case was different; it was a struggle for a cause, for a creed, a creed
of which he was the only infallible prophet. Poor, neat, respectable,
unswerving but jealous, he commanded wide admiration as the type of the
incorruptible democrat; stiffly and self-consciously he was reproducing
the popular pose of Benjamin Franklin. {195} Between him and Hebert
there could be no real union. He was willing, while Hebert remained
strong in his hold on the public, to act alongside of him, but that was
all.
Under the pressure of the Commune and the Mountain, the Convention put
the laws of terror in force against the defeated Gironde on the 3rd of
October. Forty-three deputies, including Philippe _Egalite_, were sent
to the tribunal, and about one hundred others were outlawed or ordered
under arrest. The Convention, having thus washed its hands before the
public, now felt able to make a stand against the increasing
encroachments of the Commune, and on the 10th St. Just proposed that the
Government should continue revolutionary till the peace, which meant that
the Committee of Public Safety should govern and the constitution remain
suspended.
The Committee showed as much vigour in dealing with the provinces as it
showed feebleness in dealing with Paris. Through August and September,
rebellious Lyons had been besieged; early in October it fell. The
Committee proposed a decree which the Convention accepted,--from June
1793 to July 1794 it accepted everything,--declaring that Lyons should be
razed to the earth. Couthon was {196} sent to carry out this draconian
edict, but proved too mild. At the end of October Collot d'Herbois,
Fouche and 3,000 Parisian _sans-culottes_ were sent down, and for awhile
all went well. Houses were demolished, and executions were got in hand
with so much energy that cannon and grape shot had to be used to keep
pace with the rapidity of the sentences. About three thousand persons in
all probably perished.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account