The Frontier in American HistoryTurner, Frederick Jackson
History
The Frontier in American History
Turner, Frederick Jackson
Frontier and pioneer life -- United States; Frontier thesis; United States -- History; United States -- Territorial expansion
But they did not carry with them the unmodified New England institutions
and traits. They came at a time and from a people less satisfied with
the old order than were their neighbors in the East. They were the young
men with initiative, with discontent; the New York element especially
was affected by the radicalism of Locofoco democracy which was in
itself a protest against the established order.
The winds of the prairies swept away almost at once a mass of old habits
and prepossessions. Said one of these pioneers in a letter to friends in
the East:
If you value ease more than money or prosperity, don't
come. . . . Hands are too few for the work, houses for the
inhabitants, and days for the day's work to be done. . . .
Next if you can't stand seeing your old New England ideas,
ways of doing, and living and in fact, all of the good old
Yankee fashions knocked out of shape and altered, or thrown by
as unsuited to the climate, don't be caught out here. But if
you can bear grief with a smile, can put up with a scale of
accommodations ranging from the soft side of a plank before
the fire (and perhaps three in a bed at that) down through the
middling and inferior grades; if you are never at a loss for
ways to do the most unpracticable things without tools; if you
can do all this and some more come on. . . . It is a universal
rule here to help one another, each one keeping an eye single
to his own business.
They knew that they were leaving many dear associations of the old home,
giving up many of the comforts of life, sacrificing things which those
who remained thought too vital to civilization to be left. But they were
not mere materialists ready to surrender all that life is worth for
immediate gain. They were idealists themselves, sacrificing the ease of
the immediate future for the welfare of their children, and convinced of
the possibility of helping to bring about a better social order and a
freer life. They were social idealists. But they based their ideals on
trust in the common man and the readiness to make adjustments, not on
the rule of a benevolent despot or a controlling class.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account