The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in EuropeDominian, Leon
History
The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in Europe
Dominian, Leon
Europe -- Languages; Nationalism
The language of the Macedonians is intermediate between Serbian and
Bulgarian. Its affinity with the latter, however, is sufficiently
pronounced to have led generally to merging. Travelers in the land
of the Macedonian Slavs soon learn that a knowledge of Bulgarian
will obviate difficulties due to ignorance of the country’s
vernaculars. Serbian, however, is not as readily intelligible to
the natives. This relation has favored the Bulgarian side whenever
controversy arose and compilers of linguistic or ethnographic
maps have generally abstained from differentiating the Macedonian
from the Bulgarian area.[195] The impossibility for Bulgarians to
regard the terms of the treaty of Bucarest as final is, therefore,
obvious. Extension of the Rumanian boundary to the Turtukai-Black
Sea line was also an encroachment on soil where Bulgarian was the
predominant language.[196]
The area of Bulgarian speech awarded to Greece by the treaty of
Bucarest in 1913 attains the Albanian boundary near Lakes Prespa
and Kastoria. The upper valley of the Bistritza river crosses
a region peopled by Macedonians. The former Turkish caza of
Kastoria contained a majority of Bulgarian-speaking inhabitants.
The domain of Greek speech begins south of Lapsista and extends
eastward halfway between Kailar and Kochana. Greek predominance is
maintained around Karaferia. The environs of Salonica contain a
slight excess of Greek inhabitants over Bulgarians, but the Greek
element is not as closely attached to the land as the Bulgarian.
The line of lakes on the north of the Chalcydic peninsula forms
the boundary between Greeks and Bulgarians, the latter element
extending north of these inland waters to the present Bulgarian
frontier.
The loss of Macedonia was bitterly resented by Bulgarians,
not only on account of the racial ties which bind them to
Macedonians, but also because their country’s economic development
is hampered by the want of the harbors which constitute the
natural sea outlets for the rearlands under Bulgarian rule. The
industrial and commercial development of southwestern Bulgaria
is handicapped at present by the necessity of shipping the
products of the region over a devious stretch of railroad through
Sofia-Philippopoli-Dedeagatch. The alternative via Serbia or Greece
is equally costly. The population of a considerable portion of the
country is, therefore, unable to compete with rival producers of
the two neighboring countries.
In the first half of 1913 negotiations between the Greek and
Bulgarian governments were in progress for the division of lands
conquered from the Turks. At that time the Greek government was
willing to recognize Bulgarian sovereignty over the cazas of
Kavalla, Drama, Pravista, Serres, Demir-Hissar and Kukush. This
was done on Mr. Venizelos’ understanding that these districts
were sparsely inhabited by Greeks,[197] and that Kavalla was the
natural seaport of the districts of Strumnitza, Melnik, Jumaya,
Nevrokop and Razlog.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account