The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in EuropeDominian, Leon
History
The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in Europe
Dominian, Leon
Europe -- Languages; Nationalism
The Turkish masters of the land were never able to impose their
language on the Christian population. Many of the Greek and
Bulgarian inhabitants of the region cannot speak a word of Turkish.
The fact is particularly observable among Greeks. The language of
the conqueror hovers over the land as the medium of administration.
Its function ceases then, as far as the Christian element of the
region is concerned. The Turkish population in this bit of the
Balkan peninsula is numerous, owing to the attraction exerted by
the capital. Reliable census figures are unavailable. Thanks to
the presence of a strong garrison and a host of civil-service
officials the Turkish population of Constantinople, added to the
Turks remaining in the strip of European Turkey still owned by the
Sultan after the treaty of Bucarest of 1913, probably musters as
many individuals as those to whom Greek is vernacular. An important
Armenian colony is centered at Constantinople and radiates in
settlements without the capital. These Christians also have held
fast to their native speech, although most of them can claim
proficiency in Turkish. This familiarity with the language of their
conquerors betrays their Asiatic origin, in contrast with the
ignorance of Turkish found among the Greeks, who never forget their
European affinities.
In Europe the Turk, child of the ungrateful Asiatic steppeland, has
always been the heartily despised intruder. He has shown himself
incompetent to follow up the task of conquest by assimilating the
peoples he subdued. Perhaps his lack of national ideals lies at
the root of his failure. The language he imposed on his Christian
subjects never replaced their vernacular. It was spoken only by the
males of the subdued populations. Only in rare instances did it
penetrate within their households. Hence, Turks never felt at home
in Europe. They knew that their nomad’s tent was pitched only for
a while on the continent in which they sojourned as conquerors and
as strangers. They were emigrants who had lost all memory of their
land of origin and who nevertheless could not adapt themselves
to the land which their bravery had won. The state they founded
had a weak head and no heart whatever. Under these conditions the
expulsion of Turks from Europe could always be foreseen in spite of
the weary years it took to accomplish it.
Every boundary revision that marks the successive shrinking
of Turkish territory in Europe has been attended by wholesale
emigration of Mohammedans from lands reclaimed by Christians.
Immediately after the Balkan wars of 1913 about 50,000 Turks
voluntarily departed for Asia Minor from territory allotted to
Greece. An equal number left sections of Macedonia taken over by
Serbia, while about 25,000 abandoned land annexed by Bulgaria.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account