The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in EuropeDominian, Leon
History
The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in Europe
Dominian, Leon
Europe -- Languages; Nationalism
It was the “Drang nach Osten,” a movement directed primarily
by the valleys of the Danube and the Morava, and forking out
subsequently along the Vardar and Maritza gaps. To clear this road
to Turkey, Serbia was wiped off the map of Europe in the fall of
1915 by Teutonic armies. For this too had Serbian nationality
been split into three separate bodies at the behest of Teutonic
diplomatists. Bosnia and Herzegovina, lands Serbian in heart and
logic, were administered by Austria, an empire in name like Turkey
but virtually ruled by Prussia since the day of Sadowa. Montenegro,
of old the refuge of martyred Serbia, had always been prevented by
Austria from uniting with its sister state. In truth Serbia lay
under the bane of a geographical curse. It was always in the way.
The misfortune of position is shared fully by Turkey. Coming at
right angles to Germany’s southeasterly drive, Russia’s steady
southwesterly advances in the nineteenth century foreshadowed the
conversion of all the Black Sea and its Bosporus entrance into
Russian waters. With the most inaccessible parts of the Armenian
mountains in Russian hands since 1878, further expansion through
western Armenia into Anatolia cannot be delayed much longer.
The Russian viewpoint deserves every consideration. Russia lies
benumbed by the cold of her frozen land. She has had one long
winter since the dawn of her nationality. The chief reason why her
sons have been laggards in the liberal progress of the past hundred
years must be sought in this simple fact of geography. Russia does
not need more land or fresh resources. She only seeks the warmth
of the sun’s rays. Geographically it is Russia rather than Germany
who is entitled to “her place under the sun.” Today more than ever,
and because of her newly-won liberty and democratic institutions,
Russia needs a window on the sunny side of her national dwelling.
Russian access to the open sea in the southwest can be secured
either at Constantinople or Alexandretta. The Bosporus route is the
more advantageous, as the markets for products of the plains of
southern Russia are strewn along Mediterranean coasts. But mastery
of the Bosporus is of little value to Russia without possession of
the Dardanelles strait. The Marmora is but the lobby of the Black
Sea. The entire Bosporus-Dardanelles waterway must, therefore, be
Russian in order to allow the country to reap the full advantages
of attaining ice-free seas. If fifty years ago the question was
merely one of political foresight, today it has assumed vital
importance, for southwestern Russia’s economic development, in
the present century, has made the country absolutely dependent on
Balkan and Mediterranean markets.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account