The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great IllusionAngell, Norman
History
The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great Illusion
Angell, Norman
Economic history -- 1918-1945; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence
This was revealed in a curious way at the time of the signature of the
Treaty. At the gathering of the representatives, the German delegate
spoke sitting down. It turned out afterwards that he was so ill and
distraught, that he dared not trust himself to stand up. Every paper was
full of the incident, as also of the fact that the paper-cutter in front
of him on the table was found afterwards to be broken; that he placed
his gloves upon his copy of the Treaty; and that he had thrown away his
cigarette on entering the room. These were the offences which prompted
the _Daily Mail_ to say: 'After this no one will treat the Huns as
civilised or repentant.' Almost the entire Press rang with the story of
'Rantzau's insult.' But not one paper, so far as I could discover, paid
any attention to what Rantzau had said. He said:--
'I do not want to answer by reproaches to reproaches.... Crimes in
war may not be excusable, but they are committed in the struggle
for victory and in the defence of national existence, and passions
are aroused which make the conscience of peoples blunt. The
hundreds of thousands of non-combatants who have perished since
November 11 by reason of the blockade, were killed with cold
deliberation, after our adversaries had conquered and victory had
been assured them. Think of that when you speak of guilt and
punishment.'
No one seems to have noticed this trifle in presence of the heinousness
of the cigarette, the gloves, and the other crimes. Yet this was an
insult indeed. If true, it shamefully disgraces England--if England is
responsible. The public presumably simply did not care whether it was
true or not.
A few months after the Armistice I wrote as follows:--
'When the Germans sank the _Lusitania_ and slew several hundred
women and children, _we_ knew--at least we thought we knew--that
that was the kind of thing which Englishmen could not do. In all
the hates and stupidities, the dirt and heartbreaks of the war,
there was just this light on the horizon: that there were certain
things to which we at least could never fall, in the name of
victory or patriotism, or any other of the deadly masked words that
are "the unjust stewards of men's ideas."
'And then we did it. We, too, sank _Lusitanias_. We, too, for some
cold political end, plunged the unarmed, the weak, the helpless,
the children, the suffering women, to agonising death and torture.
Without a tremor. Not alone in the bombing of cities, which we did
so much better than the enemy. For this we had the usual excuse. It
was war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account