The Gaming Table: Its Votaries and Victims. Volume 2 (of 2)Steinmetz, Andrew
History
The Gaming Table: Its Votaries and Victims. Volume 2 (of 2)
Steinmetz, Andrew
Gambling
{The best in the world at
A Frenchman,{
{sleight of hand.
My poor Brother,
and
Melting Billy,
Your humble Servant.
To the Church-Wardens, Overseers, and each
respectable inhabitant in the Parish.'
A card was enclosed, as follows:--
'****
Gaming House Keeper,
and **** **** to
The Honourable House of Commons
No. 7 and 8 **** St, St James's.'
This circular was sent to Stockdale, the publisher, in 1820, who
published it with the names in asterisks suppressed. It was evidently
intended to expose some doings in high places.
CHAPTER VIII. THE DOCTRINE OF PROBABILITIES APPLIED TO GAMBLING.
A distinction must be made between games of skill and games of chance.
The former require application, attention, and a certain degree of
ability to insure success in them; while the latter are devoid of all
that is rational, and are equally within the reach of the highest and
lowest capacity. To be successful in throwing the dice is one of the
most fickle achievements of fickle fortune; and therefore the principal
game played with them is very properly and emphatically called 'Hazard.'
It requires, indeed, some exertion of the mental powers, of memory, at
least, and a turn for such diversions, to play well many games at cards.
Nevertheless, it is often found that those who do so give no further
proofs of superior memory and judgment, whilst persons of superior
memory and judgment not unfrequently fail egregiously at the card-table.
The gamester of skill, in games of skill, may at first sight seem to
have more advantage than the gamester of chance, in games of chance; and
while cards are played merely as an amusement, there is no doubt that a
recreation is more rational when it requires some degree of skill than
one, like dice, totally devoid of all meaning whatever. But when the
pleasure becomes a business, and a matter of mere gain, there is more
innocence, perhaps, in a perfect equality of antagonists--which games of
chance, fairly played, always secure--than where one party is likely to
be an overmatch for the other by his superior knowledge or ability.
Nevertheless, even games of chance may be artfully managed; and the most
apparently casual throw of the dice be made subservient to the purposes
of chicanery and fraud, as will be shown in the sequel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account