The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual charactersMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual characters
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Genetics; Poultry; Sex (Biology)
If we lay no emphasis on the implied emotional elements in the behavior
of the spiders in this description--terms of emotion borrowed direct
from human psychology--there still remain the several types of
apparently significant reactions associated with courtship. The
statements leave no room for doubt that vision plays an important rôle
in the complex reflexes that lead gradually to successful mating. The
Peckhams insist that the display of the male is always of a kind to
bring before the female the special adornments of the male in whatever
part of the body they may lie. The chance of subjective interpretation
here is so great that unless the results are carefully checked up by
studies of the attitudes assumed by males in species in which the males
are without ornament, their interpretation must be taken with the
greatest reserve. Assigning, as our authors do, so much by gratuitous
implication to the emotional side of the picture prejudices one,
perhaps too greatly, against accepting a special (even an implied
intentional) exhibition of the specially ornamented parts. On the other
hand, if it be conceded that the conspicuousness of the male is an
element in the reaction, the very special adornments visible from the
front might be supposed to enhance the effect produced in the female.
Similar displays of special ornamentation in the male have been
described both for birds and insects, but here, too, the question has
been raised as to whether such exhibitions are more than an accidental
accompaniment of the posturing of the male, for the same kind of
behavior is known to occur in other cases where the male is unornamented
and resembles the female. Had such a male special ornamentation it would
no doubt appear to us that his behavior was “calculated” to display his
ornaments.
Dr. and Mrs. Peckham point out that their observations are entirely
inconsistent with Wallace’s interpretation of the origin of secondary
sexual characters. They find no evidence in favor of his view that the
male possesses greater “vital activity.” On the contrary, the female is
the more active and pugnacious of the two. They also object to Wallace’s
statement of a total absence of any evidence that the female notices the
display of the male. In spiders the females “_observe_” the males with
close attention during their courtship. They point out also that, in
spiders at least, as the female gradually becomes adult, a male if
preferred will have a chance of mating with several females, “and as the
mating season lasts for two or three weeks the more brilliant males may
easily be selected again and again.” In regard to Wallace’s argument as
to the distribution of accessory plumes in humming birds, the Peckhams
point out that--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account