The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual charactersMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual characters
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Genetics; Poultry; Sex (Biology)
The operative and genetic evidence for sheep shows that if the horns in
the male were developed through natural or sexual selection we should
expect them to develop also in the female. The greater development in
the male seems to be due to secretions from the testes which probably
are due to special factors that call them forth, but whether such
factors were also acquired to reinforce the effects being produced
through selection or were already present (reinforcement for horns being
only a by-product of their activity) can not of course be known. We can
suppose that special factors that suppress the development of horns in
the female may have arisen in the wild or in the domesticated races and
have been perpetuated because of some imagined benefit conferred; or
that in certain races factors were already present that kept down the
development of horns in the female. In any case such factors do not
cause their effects through secretions from the ovary, because after
ovariotomy horns do not develop; nor are they sex-linked factors. Any
speculation as to how natural or sexual selection has brought about the
evolution of the horns in sheep must reckon with the conditions imposed
on such speculation by the preceding information. So far as I can see,
it leaves the situation in this respect neither better nor worse off
than before.
In deer the effects of castration are well known, but there is no
genetic evidence to show the kind of factors involved, since no crosses
have been made between species with differences in their horns. If the
young male deer is castrated before the antlers have appeared, no horns
develop. If castrated at the time when the antlers have begun to
develop, incomplete or imperfect development follows. The antlers
remain covered with the velvet, and are said not to be thrown off
periodically as in the normal male. If the adult stag with antlers is
castrated, the horns are precociously dropped, and, if replaced at all,
the new antlers are imperfect and are not renewed. I do not know of any
cases in which females have been spayed, but no doubt the ovaries must
sometimes become diseased. There are, however, a few records of horns
developing in this sex in old age, or presumably after disease of the
ovaries. Both male and female reindeer are horned. Castration produces
no effect on the development of the horns.
In the case of deer it is evident that the presence of the testes in the
male causes the horns to develop. The genetic factor, or factors, for
horns may be supposed to be carried by both sexes, but the effects of
the factor can be seen only when the testes are present. In the reindeer
and eland, on the other hand, the genetic factor for sex can produce
horns without the need of the environment produced by the testes.[15]
Whether we are dealing here with the same factor or whether the rest of
the hereditary complex makes the result different can not be known
without breeding experiments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account