The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual charactersMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual characters
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Genetics; Poultry; Sex (Biology)
The influence of the ovary in suppressing the cock plumage has been
convincingly shown in an experiment of Goodale’s, in which, after
removal of both testes from the young Leghorn cock, pieces of ovaries
were inserted into the body-cavity. As dissection showed later, several
of these implanted pieces grew onto the wall of the body-cavity. The
birds developed the plumage of a hen, although some traces of the male
plumage were at times present. The difference between the sexes is so
great in Brown Leghorns that the hen-feathering of the feminized
cockerels leaves no doubt that the presence of the ovary had produced
the female coloration.
Geoffrey Smith and Mrs. Haig Thomas (1913) have examined a number of
hybrid pheasants, some of which were sterile. They found that the ovary
(and oviduct) was often small and degenerate. There was a more or less
corresponding tendency for such female hybrids to show male feathering,
at least in a part of the plumage. The degeneration of the sex element,
however, does not take place until after the time of synapsis, so that
the younger germ-cells may be normal. The later degeneration of these
cells is not likely to influence the secondary sexual characters, but
may be an index of changes in other parts of the ovary.
Geoffrey Smith had a breed of White Leghorns with cocks of two
classes--those that assumed cock plumage at 6 months, and those that are
like the hens for 8 months, after which they slowly assume the
cock-feathering. The difference is hereditary and appears to segregate.
Possibly this breed had one factor at least for hen-feathering that is
more effective for young birds than for older ones.
Smith states that birds and crabs (see _infra_) appear to give opposite
results, since removal of the ovary in the former leads to development
of secondary male characters and removal of testes in the latter to
secondary female characters. But he adds that he thinks the results are
really the same, because in the crab it is not the suppression of the
testis but the feminization of the male by the Sacculina that causes the
change.
There are a number of observations on ducks. Several cases have been
recorded where in old age the female assumed the male plumage (Darwin,
Shattock, and Sellheim). Also a few cases in which the testes were
removed. Those of Goodale are the most complete and striking. The male
duck has two characteristic plumages, one called the nuptial, also
called the summer or breeding plumage that is assumed at the molt in the
autumn, and the other the eclipse plumage, which is not identical with
but much like that of the female. Here, then, we find a new situation,
and one that invites comparison with the condition in Sebrights, in so
far as the male becomes hen-feathered at certain seasons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account