The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
Contrary to the general mode adopted by imitators and fakers of copying
the various parts here and there from Renaissance work, welding them
into a would-be _tout ensemble_ of originality, Bastianini had so
imbibed the character of the fifteenth century that he was able to
work without immediate suggestions other than the influence of the
recollections and skill he had acquired by copying from good old models
in his preparatory period. Thus the work was done straight from nature,
the model chosen being an old man nicknamed the _Priore_, employed in
a cigar factory. When the clay was still fresh, struck by the unusual
Renaissance style of the bust, someone suggested the name by which it
was finally christened, and Bastianini inscribed the words: HIER^{MUS}
BENIVIENI.
The name of Girolamo Benivieni, Savonarola’s poet friend, was in
keeping with the austere features of the portrait, and the modest
employé of the Florentine cigar factory well represented one of the
most illustrious types of Republican Florence.
When Nolives exhibited Bastianini’s work in 1867 as a specimen of
Renaissance sculpture at the Retrospective Art Show of the Palais des
Champs Élysées, an influential art critic wrote:
“We have not known Benivieni, but are prepared to swear that this
portrait must be extremely like him. Who is the artist that modelled
it? We are almost tempted to label the work with a string of names from
the glorious period of Florentine art.”
Noting, incidentally, that the art critic’s temptation to go through
a long litany of names by way of attribution is simply delightful, we
may state that the illustrious writer was not the only one to be caught
and duped by Bastianini’s capital work. The supposititious Girolamo
Benivieni had turned the heads of all the art intellectuals of Paris.
Later on, when Nolive’s collection was put up to auction the bust was
acquired, as we have already stated, by Nieuwerkerque for the sum of
13,600 francs and was finally placed in the Louvre Museum.
It is said that, believing the bust to be antique, Nolives wrote
to Bastianini bantering him upon his gross error in letting such a
stupendous “find” slip from his hands.
Finally the name of Bastianini as the author of the bust leaked out.
Admiration began to cool, opinions as to the genuineness of the work
were divided and a long polemic over the case ensued.
When Bastianini, up to then an obscure Florentine artist, finally
declared in a letter sent to the _Diritto_, an Italian newspaper, that
he himself was the author of the Benivieni, he was supposed to be an
imposter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account