The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
The first of the three identical shields, all of which came to Paris,
was palmed off on Mr. Didier-Petit, an excellent connoisseur, who
paid the good round sum of £400 for this fine piece of imitation. It
was repoussé work with a mythological subject in the centre, “Jove
fulminating the Titans.” The person to be struck down really, however,
was poor Mr. Didier-Petit, rather than the Titans, for on realizing
that he had been fooled he died of grief or apoplexy, brought on
by his disillusion, and wounded pride as a connoisseur. Under the
auctioneer’s hammer at a subsequent sale, the famous shield fetched £20.
The second, of identical make, was very nearly passed off on Baron
Davillier, perhaps the most esteemed connoisseur of his time. Baron
Davillier was offered the rare piece in Spain. He was struck at first
by its beauty and appearance of authenticity as well as the plausible
story by which the owner explained his possession of such a valuable
object. The bargain was struck at £320 and, happy over his piece of
good luck, Baron Davillier, like a true collector, hastened to convey
his find safely to his home in Paris. Noticing at the Custom House
that the official treated his precious find with indifference, he
became suspicious, and his suspicion of having been cheated grew to
certainty before the end of the journey. It would take long to recount
the circumstances by which Baron Davillier recovered his £320, suffice
it to say that he did recover them and the Spaniard replaced the faked
shield in the panoply from whence the Baron had taken it down, swearing
all the time that it was genuine even though the Baron had seen another
like it, that there might be twins among articles of virtu, etc.
But there was still the third of the shield triplet fated to come to
Paris, bought by the well-known expert called, or rather nicknamed,
Couvreur. Curiously enough, this third expert from one and the same
city was also a specialist in arms, as Baron Davillier might have
been considered, had his immense knowledge not conferred upon him the
character of a specialist in almost every branch of connoisseurship.
[Illustration: PLAQUETTES OF VARIOUS ARTISTS.
Imitations of Roman work.]
Where did Couvreur buy this third shield? From the very man who tried
to cheat Baron Davillier. It appears it was not the same shield as
the Baron’s, though of identical workmanship, for there were trifling
differences between it and the fake No. 2 to reach Paris. Couvreur had
paid a fine price for his find, £800. He never recovered his money and
created a scandal by presenting the piece for exhibition at the World’s
Show of 1878, insulting the judges upon their refusal to place it among
the genuine pieces. Thus he lived and died maintaining that all who
believed the piece to be a fake were fools.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account