The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
“We owe, it is more than possible, the Venus of the Hermitage to
Cæsar; the well-known ‘Whetter’ has almost certainly been saved to
our admiration by Lucullus, just as Cicero may be thanked for the
‘Demosthenes’ and the collecting passion of Sallust has handed down
to us the ‘Faun,’ the ‘Hermaphrodite’ and the ‘Vase’ of the Villa
Borghese.”
These remarks of a well-known French collector who mainly notes
works contained in the Louvre Museum might be extended to many other
collections, especially those of Rome, where several of the works of
art have old historical records of undisputed character.
From the Renaissance down to our own days the pedigrees of celebrated
works of art are not only surer, but present at times a less
interrupted line of descent. With such it is not uncommon to find a
rare object pass from one collector to another, receiving the same care
and consideration as though passing from father to son as a cherished
heirloom--and it is, in fact, passing from one to another member of
the same family, the family bound by an identical burning passion, that
of collecting.
As to the essence of this passion, so often confounded with mania--a
mistake calling forth the following comment from a French collector:
“... _confondre la ‘manie’ avec la curiosité, c’est prendre l’hysterie
pour l’amour, ‘la Belle Helenè’ pour l’Iliade_”--we should like to
quote Gersaint, one of the few men who as art dealer and collector in
one, what might be styled private dealer in modern phrase, impersonated
the passion, as we have said, in its highest expression among the many
collectors of the eighteenth century. It must be understood, of course,
that Gersaint, one of these maniacs in, say, La Bruyère’s opinion,
was a representative of those passionate collectors who subordinate
every other passion of mankind to the one they have made the sole aim
of their lives. “... A _curieux_,” says this unilateral lover but not
hobbyist collector, “has the advantage of not falling an easy prey to
the many passions so familiar to the human family: the _curiosité_
fills all the empty spaces of his leisure moments. Entertained by his
cherished possessions, he has time only for working at the advance
of his _curiosité_, and his cabinet becomes the centre of all his
pleasures, and the seat of all his passions.”
The outsider and half-way-insider will agree that this is a trifle too
much; but, after all, the great collectors who have left to the museums
of their countries fortunes that would have been lost but for their
intense passion--treasures of art left by the ignorant to the doom
of decay--have all felt, more or less, the burning passion described
by Gersaint, in the passage quoted which goes on to assert that a true
paradise awaits the perfect collector, who is never bored, and never
the prey of spleen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account