The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
Cellini, to illustrate another aspect, is a different case. He can
repair antiquities for his patron, Cosimo Medici, fairly well, but
he, also, is too highly individual to make an excellent imitation of
the antique. He tells us that he consented to repair his illustrious
patron’s Ganymede because it was a fine Greek work, and, prone as he
is to self-praise, he tells how stupendously he can do it; but he does
not like such work, he calls it _arte da Ciabattini_ (cobbler-work).
The fact, however, is that he is too much alive to his time, has too
strong an expression of his own art to be skilful in imitations. In
fact it happened that he had to try his hand at a portrait of Cosimo
I, in the guise of a Roman emperor. The portrait of the Grand Duke of
Tuscany will never deceive any art simpleton, in spite of its elaborate
cuirass fit for Augustus. Cellini is too delightfully cinquecentesque.
The same may be said of him as a medallist. Yet in some of Cellini’s
work, especially his medals, the idea of imitating the Romans must have
been in his mind, and no doubt he was convinced of his success. Yet he
belonged to the group that by their personality influenced others, and
when trying his hand at imitation quite congenial to his own artistic
temperament he makes something that is at least three-quarters Cellini.
These artists nevertheless admire the art of the past, though with
no danger of infection. Michelangelo is entranced when the _Laocoön_
is discovered in a vineyard near the Thermæ of Titus, and goes with
his friend Sangallo to see that the precious statue be carefully
unearthed. Partly for the sake of gain, and partly, maybe, for the love
of art, Cellini often goes to the Roman Campagna to see what “certain
Lombard yokels” have uncovered in their daily spading of the soil.
Raphael protests, in a famous document addressed to Leo X, against the
continual destruction of Roman relics. His words are worth repeating.
After declaring that the Goths and Vandals have not done so much damage
to Rome as his contemporaries, Raphael concludes by saying that far
too many popes have allowed Roman edifices to be ruined simply by
permitting the excavation of _pozzolana_ (clay) from the ground upon
which their foundations rest, that statues and marble ornaments are
daily burned in ovens and turned into mortar, that Rome, in fact--the
Rome of Raphael’s time--is built with naught but mortar made from old
statues, the sacred marbles of past glories.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account