The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
We have seen in Chapter IV that the scholars of the Chartres group and
their pupils during the early twelfth century were endowed with peculiar
freedom of thought.[565] We note in the works of Bernard, Theodoric,
Adelard of Bath, William of Conches, and Bernard Sylvester a wide
departure from authoritative, orthodox theology. Theodoric, William, and
the two Bernards were readers of Chalcidius’ translation of the
_Timaeus_, of Macrobius, and perhaps of the writings of the great
ninth-century Platonist, John Scot Erigena, and all four felt the
powerful and seductive attraction of Platonism. Bernard Sylvester was
almost an out-and-out pagan, so much so, indeed, that his writings can
hardly be considered to lie within the pale of Christian theology.[566]
Theodoric and William tried harder to reconcile Platonism with the
teachings of the church, yet they did so in a rationalistic spirit
almost as abhorrent to strict orthodoxy as the paganism of Bernard
Sylvester. Theodoric expressly stated in his _De sex dierum operibus_
that he was going to explain the different Works of the Six Days
“according to physical principles,” and, following the letter of the
text,[567] he proposed to avoid all allegorical and moral
interpretations of Scripture. He believed that the best way to attain a
genuine knowledge of God was through an accurate understanding of what
God had created; and his explanation of the Creation, as we shall soon
see, was independent to a degree that amazes us in a writer of his time.
The following phrase is particularly significant where Theodoric extols
Moses’ treatment of the Creation in Genesis, saying: “He shows in a
rational manner the causes out of which this world has come into
existence and the order of time in which this same world was founded and
adorned.”[568] Hauréau writes of the first book of Theodoric’s
commentary: “Quant au premier livre, essai d’accord entre la Genèse et
le _Timée_, où l’on voit la religion et la philosophie conspirant à
résoudre le plus grave et le plus obscur des problèmes, le problème de
l’être, et se déclarant satisfaites de l’avoir résolu, ce premier livre
est ... de plus grand intéret.”[569]
ADELARD OF BATH AND WILLIAM OF CONCHES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account