The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
_The Orthodox View_
Theodoric of Chartres, on the other hand, explicitly denied the
coëxistence of the _materia primordialis_ with God before the Creation.
In this respect he showed himself far less divergent than Bernard from
the Christian point of view. The work of the first day, he said, was the
creation from nothing of the _materia_ of the universe, out of which
earth and heaven, fire and water and life were to be evolved.[589] This
_materia_ was the _hyle_, or chaos, of the ancient philosophers, he
explained, and was designated by Moses in the book of Genesis under
various names.[590] For example, when Moses wrote, “In the beginning God
created the heaven and the earth” (Gen. i, 1) the words “heaven” and
“earth” referred to chaos; when Moses wrote, “And the earth was without
form and void” (Gen. i, 2) the word “earth” referred to the primordial
mixture of land and water, a mingling of land that was not solid and of
water that was not liquid. Air and fire at that time were of about the
density of water.
Theodoric’s interpretation of the initial process of the Creation was
entirely in keeping with the views of more orthodox writers. Peter
Lombard, for instance, wrote as follows: “In the beginning God created
the ‘heaven,’ that is to say the angels, and the ‘earth,’ by which is
meant the material which composed the four elements. The latter were as
yet in the confused and formless condition to which the Greeks gave the
name of chaos, and this was before any day.”[591]
Peter Comestor also set forth an orthodox view of the Creation. In his
commentary on Genesis he revealed a love of the number three and
classified every thing possible into groups of three.[592] He pointed
out how Moses had avoided three errors. “First, that of Plato, who had
conceived of three coëxistent things, God, _ile_ (_hyle_, or chaos), and
time, and that the world was made out of _ile_; second, that of
Aristotle, who had conceived of two coëxistent things, the world and the
fashioner thereof (_mundus et opifex_); and third, that of Epicurus, who
had also conceived of two, space (_inane_) and matter in the form of
atoms, and that in the beginning natural processes had brought together
certain atoms to form water, others to form earth, and others to form
fire. Moses, however, had said that God alone was eternal and that the
world was created out of nothing, for there was no matter in existence
prior to the ‘Creation.’”[593] “In the beginning” meant in the beginning
of time as well as of matter, for time and matter were coëternal.[594]
_A Rational View_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account