The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
Theodoric of Chartres, Adelard of Bath, and John of Holywood, on the
other hand, adduced proofs of the immobility of the earth which had been
derived indirectly from Aristotle. Theodoric asserted[676] that the
earth does not gain its compactness either from its inherent nature,
because earth is actually observed on occasions to become mingled with
air; or from the weight of the overlying atmosphere and sphere of fire,
because these have no weight. What, then, keeps it from flying to
pieces? Here Theodoric appealed to the Peripatetic reasoning that the
circular motion of the heavens necessitates the existence of a solid and
immovable body in the center.[677] All heavy bodies acquire their
_substantia_, or solidity, from the motion of light bodies; and
conversely light bodies derive their motion from heavy bodies.
The _Quaestiones naturales_ of Adelard of Bath is in the form of a
dialogue between Adelard and a nephew who asks questions. The nephew was
much puzzled by the fact that, whereas heavy objects like rocks need a
piece of wood or other support to hold them up in the air, the earth as
a whole, much the heaviest of all, requires no such support.[678]
Adelard replies first that the earth does not fall because there would
be no utility in its doing so; then he proceeds to show by a rational
argument (_rationabiliter_) why the earth does not need a support. The
principal quality of earth he says, is heaviness; heavy bodies naturally
seek the lowest position (_infimum_); the lowest position of a spherical
body like the universe is its center—though why this latter proposition
is so, Adelard fails to make clear. At all events, the earth tends to
seek the center of the universe, just as a stone thrown into an
imaginary hole piercing the center of the earth would come to a halt
there.[679] Since the center of the universe is one point, not several,
the earth forms a single unit, not several; and for these reasons,
moreover, the earth is stable and immobile.
John of Holywood explained[680] the same thing more briefly than Adelard
by simply stating that the immobility of the earth is due to its weight,
since it is the nature of all heavy things to seek the center of the
universe and since the earth is the heaviest of all elements. Both
Adelard’s and John of Holywood’s arguments suggest the Aristotelian
doctrine of an equilibrium of forces around the center of the globe,
though this doctrine is not cited in so many words. Like most medieval
writers, Adelard and John seem only partially to have understood the
obscure texts from which they derived their proofs and to have left out
many links in their chains of reasoning.
SIZE OF THE EARTH
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account