The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
Classical names for the winds were almost universally employed. The
distinction between cardinal and collateral which was made by William of
Conches goes back to the Greeks,[774] who had conceived of four cardinal
and four, six, seven, or eight collateral winds. Seneca’s[775] rose of
twelve winds, the idea of which in its essentials had been derived from
Posidonius, Timosthenes, and, ultimately, from Aristotle, was adopted by
Isidore, who passed it on to the Middle Ages, though terrible confusion
(which, happily, it is not necessary for us to unravel) reigned at all
times regarding the names employed to designate its elements.[776] In
addition to the classical terms, our modern names were already familiar.
In the Ghent manuscript of Lambert of St. Omer’s _Liber floridus_[777]
there is a diagram in which the winds are called “ost-ost,” “sud-ost,”
“sud-sud,” “sud-west,” “west-west,” “nord-west,” “nord-nord,” and
“nord-ost.” This terminology was used in the time of Charlemagne[778]
and is probably of Anglo-Saxon origin,[779] although it has been
suggested that the terms are corruptions of Latin words—“ost” from
“Augustus;” “ovest,” or “west,” from “ob est;” “nord” from “novus
arctus,” etc.[780]
_Qualities of the Winds_
To the various winds classical and medieval writers liked to attribute
qualities—or, at any rate, descriptive adjectives, “cold” or “hot,”
“dry” or “damp,” “stormy” or “calm,” and the like—but there was little
enough uniformity in making these distinctions. Some writers of our
period seem to have been content merely to repeat what had been said in
classical times; others, like William of Conches or Giraldus Cambrensis,
showed more independence. Boreas was probably universally regarded as
cold and Auster as hot, but beyond this we cannot generalize.[781]
William of Conches[782] conceived of the winds as partaking of the
qualities of the regions over which they blow: Auster, coming from the
South Pole and hence originally frigid like Boreas, in its passage
across the torrid, equatorial zone becomes hot and dry—an observation
which may perhaps be founded on some knowledge of the _sirocco_ of the
Mediterranean. On the other hand, Giraldus Cambrensis, undoubtedly from
personal acquaintance with the water-laden south and southwest gales of
the British Isles, calls Auster damp and rainy in winter. Similarly
Giraldus breaks with classical tradition when he speaks of the east
wind, or Eurus, as pure and clear, a bringer of fair summer weather,
strikingly different from Zephyr, wet and cloudy from the sea.[783]
_Local Winds_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account