The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
Boniface and a certain Virgil, bishop of Salzburg.[242] The latter, who
doubtless thought that there were antipodal regions if not antipodeans,
was accused by Pope Zachary, to whom St. Boniface had complained, of
holding “perverse and iniquitous doctrines regarding another world.”
Unfortunately we do not possess Virgil’s own account of the incident and
are unable to tell exactly what these doctrines were.[243] At all
events, belief in antipodes contained the seeds of bitter religious
quarrels and was one of the charges brought against Cecco d’Ascoli, who,
after our period, was burnt to death for holding this and other damning
convictions.[244]
_PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY_
In the field of physical geography slight was the contribution of the
early medieval writers.
METEOROLOGY
Classical ideas about the atmosphere were repeated and garbled,[245]
little progress was made in the development of earlier theories, and
little new was added but superstition. Isidore, followed closely by Bede
and Raban Maur, was the primary authority in matters of
meteorology.[246] The ancient view persisted, that the polar regions
were uninhabitable on account of cold and the equatorial zone on account
of heat. The sort of popular meteorology that prevailed is illustrated
in an early ninth-century treatise written by Agobard, archbishop of
Lyons, and entitled _Against the Absurd Opinion of the Vulgar Touching
Hail and Thunder_.[247] This was an attack on charlatans who claimed
that they could control the weather, produce storms and hail at will,
and who asserted that there is a region, called Magonia, “whence ships
come in the clouds” (Poole’s translation).[248] Natural enough as it is
for the uneducated in any age to believe such things,[249] the
significant fact here is that Agobard did not attempt to invoke
scientific arguments to confute the claims of the impostors. Poole says:
“He disdained to allege scientific reasons to overthrow what was in its
nature unreasonable. He could only fall back on ... broad religious
principles. He argued that God’s relation to nature is immediate and
least of all conditioned by the artifices of men.”[250]
THE WATERS ABOVE THE FIRMAMENT
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account