The geography and geology of south-eastern EgyptBall, John
Science
The geography and geology of south-eastern Egypt
Ball, John
Geology -- Egypt; Physical geography -- Egypt
All detail visible along lines of march from camp to camp was recorded
on plane-table sheets on a scale of 1:100,000. The usual process
was as follows: The plane-table sheet was first provided with a
graticule at 10′ intervals of latitude and longitude, and all the
triangulation points previously fixed within the area covered by the
sheet were marked in their computed places. Stations were chosen along
the route at an average distance apart of two or three kilometres,
the most commanding hills being selected, and the positions of these
were found by plane-table re-section from three or more triangulation
points. The compass, being frequently disturbed by magnetic rocks,[76]
was only used to get a first approximation to the true orientation
of the table. The plane-table station having been fixed on the map,
tacheometric readings were taken to all conspicuous points easy of
access within a radius of about two kilometres, and plotted at their
measured distances along the directions given by the alidade.
In the telemetric measurements a 5-inch tacheometer was used side
by side with the plane-table, and two staff-men were employed. As
the scale of the map was small, the sights were much longer than is
usual in tacheometry, and the maximum distance of 800 metres directly
readable by the four-metre staves employed was generally exceeded. For
the long distance readings, where the distance between two cross-wires
subtended more than the length of the staff, I devised the following
process. Bringing the centre wire to the base of the staff, a reading
of the vertical circle was taken; next, by the tangent-screw, the
wire was brought to the top of the staff, and a second reading of the
vertical circle was taken, the difference giving the angle subtended
by the four-metre staff. It is clear that the distance is as many
times greater than 800 metres, as the angle subtended is less than
17′ of arc, and the distance is thus found by simple proportion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account