The geography and geology of south-eastern EgyptBall, John
Science
The geography and geology of south-eastern Egypt
Ball, John
Geology -- Egypt; Physical geography -- Egypt
----------------------------------+----------------------------------
Berenice. | Mersa Halaib.
------------------------+---------+-----------------------+----------
Rossler, Nov. 27, 1895 |3° 54′ |Rossler, Nov. 18, 1895 |3° 36′
| | |
Ball, Jan. 6, 1907 |2° 44′ |Ball, May 7, 1908 |2° 18′
+---------+ +----------
Diff. in 11·1 years|1° 10′ | Diff. in 12·5 years|1° 18′
| | |
Yearly decrease| 6′·3 | Yearly decrease| 6′·3
------------------------+---------+-----------------------+----------
We thus arrive at a yearly secular diminution of declination of
6′ 3″, confirming the value arrived at by Mr. KEELING[82] for
the rate of secular change in the Red Sea area from a comparison of
other observations. It may be therefore concluded that the rate of
3′ per annum given in the “Admiralty Pilot”[83] is only about
half the true value.
Travellers in the Eastern Desert should exercise care in the reliance
they place on compass bearings. Bearings taken with a compass are
generally normal in granite and sandstone country; but wherever dark
igneous and metamorphic rocks abound, disturbances are likely to
occur. Local deviations of 5° to 10° are quite common, and in some
serpentine areas even 40° of disturbance may be observed. In some
places, one can deflect the needle through a large angle by means
of a fragment of the rock no larger than a nut, so rich are some of
the basic rocks in magnetic minerals. Some lumps of rock even show
strong polarity, attracting or repelling the north pole of the needle
according as one part or another of the lump is presented to it.
* * * * *
[Footnote 62: This measurement was made in conjunction with
Messrs. Villiers Stuart, Charteris Stewart, and Clarke.]
[Footnote 63: The logarithms A′, B, and C are taken from
Merriman’s _Precise Surveying and Geodesy_, 1899, 255. p.]
[Footnote 64: CHAUVENET (_Spherical and Practical Astronomy_, Vol. I,
p. 283) shows that when both latitude and time are required, the three
stars should differ in azimuth by 120° to give the most accurate
results. But when only the latitude is required the stars are best
selected near to the meridian north and south of the zenith. This
is evident by considering that if two stars could be observed to
culminate at the same altitude on opposite sides of the zenith,
the latitude would be precisely determined independently of any
reference to time.]
[Footnote 65: I am indebted to Mr. B. H. Wade, of the Survey
Department, for drawing my attention to this method.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account