The Geological Story of the Isle of WightHughes, J. Cecil (John Cecil)
Science
The Geological Story of the Isle of Wight
Hughes, J. Cecil (John Cecil)
Geology -- England -- Isle of Wight; Geology, Stratigraphic -- Tertiary; Paleontology -- England -- Isle of Wight
The Chalk and overlying Tertiary strata were uplifted from the sea in
great folds forming a series of such turtle-backs as we have been
considering. The line of upheaval was not south-west and north-east,
as that which raised the older formations in bands across England, but
took place in an east and west direction. The main upheaval was that
of the great Wealden anticline. Other folds produced the Sandown and
Brook anticlines, and that of the Portsdown Hills. The upheaval seemed
to have been caused by pressure acting from the south, for the steeper
slope of each fold is on the northern side. Our latest Oligocene
strata are tilted with the chalk, showing that the upheaval took place
after Oligocene times. But the great movement was in the main earlier
than the Pliocene. For on the North Downs near Lenham is a patch of
Lower Pliocene deposit resting directly on the Chalk, the older
Tertiary strata having been removed by denudation, clearly due to the
uplift of the Wealden anticline. The raising of the Pliocene deposit
to its present position proves that the same movement was continued at
a later time, probably during the Pleistocene. But the greater part of
the movement may be assigned to the Miocene, the period of great
world-movements which raised the Alps and the Himalaya.
Many remarkable, and, at first sight, very puzzling features connected
with the courses of rivers find an explanation when we study the river
history. Thus, looking at the Weald of Kent and Sussex, we see that it
consists of comparatively low ground rising to a line of heights east
and west along the centre, and surrounded on all sides but the
south-east by a wall of Chalk downs. If we considered the subject, we
should suppose that the drainage of the country would be towards the
south-east, which is open to the sea. Not so. All the rivers flow from
the central heights north and south,--go straight for the walls of
chalk downs, and cut through the escarpment in deep clefts to flow
into the Thames and the Channel. This is explained when we remember
that the rivers began to flow when the great curve of strata rose
above the sea. Though eroded by the sea during its elevation, yet when
it rose above the waters the arch of chalk must have been continuous
from what are now North Downs to South. And from the centre line of
the great turtle back the streams began to flow north and south,
cutting in the course of ages deep channels for themselves. The
greater erosion in their higher courses has cut away the mass of chalk
from the centre of the Weald, but the rivers still flow in the
direction determined when the arch was still entire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account