The giant sequoia : $b An account of the history and characteristics of the big trees of CaliforniaEllsworth, Rodney Sydes
Science
The giant sequoia : $b An account of the history and characteristics of the big trees of California
Ellsworth, Rodney Sydes
Giant sequoia
Even a people as cultivated as the Chinese have never made the next
stride which Sequoyah took. The Chinese still employ the lowest stage
of writing in all its absurd prolixity with the result that long years
of study and a memory above the average are required for its mastery.
This is largely the reason, too, why intellectual democracy is so
noticeably absent in China. The Chinese language is too elaborate
in structure, too laborious in use, and too inflexible in form to
thoroughly saturate China’s teeming millions and to meet the need of a
simple, swift, and lucid communication of thought. Our alphabet, on the
other hand, answers these requirements. “It is because the Egyptians
passed into the glory of the true alphabet that the Phoenicians
simplified and improved it, and that the Greeks were able to transmit
it to occidental civilization that western nations have been able to
make such tremendous mental progress and established such a wide and
common knowledge.” It is quite obvious that Sequoyah was not blundering
when he discarded his pictograph system if he would achieve his ideal.
After long and patient study he began a search for the unity of speech.
At length he discovered that _sound_ was the key in the construction
of language. Then by attentive listening for another period he
discovered that the sounds in the words spoken by the Cherokees could
be analyzed and classified and could be represented by hardly more
than a hundred syllables. Further analysis revealed two distinct types
of sounds, vowels and consonants. Classifying the sounds according
to this division, he found that there were six vowel and seventy-two
consonant sounds. Thirty-seven sounds still remained unclassified.
By dint of further analysis he found that these were of a hissing or
guttural nature. In an ingenious way he represented the former by seven
combinations and the latter by one. As a result, in this expeditious
manner he was able to write a copious language vastly wealthier in its
vocabulary than ours, with but eighty-five characters.
The best authorities are agreed that our alphabet is, in some respects,
the greatest invention of the human mind. Yet it is not the product of
a single mind, but the accretion of Egyptian, Phoenician, and Greek
wisdom extending over a period of at least three thousand years.
Excellent as our alphabet is, it fails to outrank that of Sequoyah in
point of felicity and ease of mastery. Ours is superior in that it
goes to the unit of speech, _sound_, and has characters that stand for
sound. Sequoyah’s alphabet had characters that stood for combinations
of sounds or syllables. Our alphabet is the only sound-for-a-sign
system of writing yet invented. It is an alphabet of letters, while
that of Sequoyah was an alphabet of syllables. James Mooney claims that
it ranks second to all systems of writing ever known to the world.
It certainly could not have been the work of other than a gigantic
intellect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account