The Glaciers of the Alps: Being a narrative of excursions and ascents, an account of the origin and phenomena of glaciers and an exposition of the physical principles to which they are relatedTyndall, John
Science
The Glaciers of the Alps: Being a narrative of excursions and ascents, an account of the origin and phenomena of glaciers and an exposition of the physical principles to which they are related
Tyndall, John
Alps -- Description and travel; Glaciers -- Alps
If then we stand before a wall of ice, the wall radiates heat to us, and
we also radiate heat to it; but the quantity which we radiate being
greater than that which the ice radiates, we lose more than we gain, and
are consequently chilled. If, on the contrary, we stand before a warm
stove, a system of exchanges also takes place; but here the quantity we
receive is in excess of the quantity lost, and we are warmed by the
difference.
In like manner the earth radiates heat by day and by night into space,
and against the sun, moon, and stars. By day, however, the quantity
received is greater than the quantity lost, and the earth is warmed; by
night the conditions are reversed; the earth radiates more heat than is
sent to her by the moon and stars, and she is consequently cooled.
But here an important point is to be noted:--the earth receives the heat
of the sun, moon, and stars, in great part as _luminous_ heat, but she
gives it out as _obscure_ heat. I do not now speak of the heat reflected
by the earth into space, as the light of the moon is to us; but of the
heat which, after it has been absorbed by the earth, and has contributed
to warm it, is radiated into space, as if the earth itself were its
independent source. Thus we may properly say that the heat radiated from
the earth is _different in quality_ from that which the earth has
received from the sun.
[Sidenote: QUALITIES OF HEAT.]
In one particular especially does this difference of quality show
itself; besides being non-luminous, the heat radiated from the earth is
more easily intercepted and absorbed by almost all transparent
substances. A vast portion of the sun's rays, for example, can pass
instantaneously through a thick sheet of water; gunpowder could easily
be fired by the heat of the sun's rays converged by passing through a
thick water lens; the drops upon leaves in greenhouses often act as
lenses, and cause the sun to burn the leaves upon which they rest. But
with regard to the rays of heat emanating from an obscure source, they
are all absorbed by a layer of water less than the 20th of an inch in
thickness: water is opaque to such rays, and cuts them off almost as
effectually as a metallic screen. The same is true of other liquids, and
also of many transparent solids.
[Sidenote: THE ATMOSPHERE LIKE A RATCHET.]
Assuming the same to be true of gaseous bodies, that they also intercept
the obscure rays much more readily than the luminous ones, it would
follow that while the sun's rays penetrate our atmosphere with freedom,
the change which they undergo in warming the earth deprives them in a
measure of this penetrating power. They can reach the earth, but _they
cannot get back_; thus the atmosphere acts the part of a ratchet-wheel
in mechanics; it allows of motion in one direction, but prevents it in
the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account