The Glaciers of the Alps: Being a narrative of excursions and ascents, an account of the origin and phenomena of glaciers and an exposition of the physical principles to which they are relatedTyndall, John
Science
The Glaciers of the Alps: Being a narrative of excursions and ascents, an account of the origin and phenomena of glaciers and an exposition of the physical principles to which they are related
Tyndall, John
Alps -- Description and travel; Glaciers -- Alps
This theory was first communicated to the Royal Society through the
author's brother, Prof. William Thomson, and is printed in the
'Proceedings' of the Society for May, 1857. It was afterwards
communicated to the British Association in Dublin, in whose 'Reports'
it is further published; and again it was communicated to the Belfast
Literary and Philosophical Society, in whose 'Proceedings' it also finds
a place.
On the 24th of November, 1859, Mr. James Thomson communicated to the
Royal Society, through his brother, a second paper, in which he again
draws attention to his theory. He offers it in substitution for my views
as the best argument that he can adduce against them; he also
controverts the explanations of regelation propounded by Prof. James D.
Forbes and Prof. Faraday, believing that his own theory explains all the
facts so well as to leave room for no other.
[Sidenote: DIFFICULTIES OF THEORY.]
But the passage in this paper which demands my chief attention is the
following:--"Prof. Tyndall (writes Mr. Thomson), in papers and lectures
subsequent to the publication of this theory, appears to adopt it to
some extent, and to endeavour to make its principles co-operate with the
views he had previously founded on Mr. Faraday's fact of regelation." I
may say that Mr. Thomson's main thought was familiar to me long before
his first communication on the plasticity of ice appeared; but it had
little influence upon my convictions. Were the above passage correct, I
should deserve censure for neglecting to express my obligations far more
explicitly than I have hitherto done; but I confess that even now I do
not understand the essential point of Mr. Thomson's theory,--that is to
say, its application to the phenomena of glacier motion. Indeed, it was
the obscurity in my mind in connexion with this point, and the hope that
time might enable me to seize more clearly upon his meaning, which
prevented me from giving that prominence to the theory of Mr. Thomson
which, for aught I know, it may well deserve. I will here briefly state
one or two of my difficulties, and shall feel very grateful to have them
removed.
[Sidenote: IMPROBABLE DEDUCTION.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account